Lecture notes
Privity of Contract
- Module
- Contract law
- Institution
- Cambridge University (CAM)
2i Contract law notes
[Show more]
Content preview
Contract Law Supervision 3: Third PartiesTextbook Reading: McKendrick TCM Chapter 25 – Third-party Rights
Generally: privity of contract subject to various common law exceptions and Contracts
(Rights of Third parties) Act 1999. Typically, one can confer a benefit onto a third party
but not an obligation.
I. Introduction
1. Can a third party acquire rights under a contract? Yes. Trietel: 20th century ‘battle
over privity’ resulted in 1999 Act
2. Can a third party be subject to obligations / liabilities under a contract? No
II. Contract Structures
Contracts often linked eg sub-contracting. But to sue for PEL in tort is difficult. How to
protect own interests?
If X contracts with Y and Y sub-contracts with Z, X must make Y assume liability for Z’s
breach of duty. Alternative – collateral warranty between X and Z: Alfred Mc Alpine
Construction Ltd v Panatown [2001]. But Z may be reluctant to assume liability – default
approach = sue down the chain of contracts, ie XYZ. Or – A buys from B with finance
from C. B could sell used car to bank (who resells to A, but in the absence of a collateral
contract, the buyer may not be able to claim against B for a defective car). Or – C lends to
A; A pays B – dealer sells car to consumer and then assumes it contractual rights against
consumer to finance house in return for immediate cash.
III. Third Parties and the Acquisition of Contractual Rights
(a) General Rule of Common Law: No third party rights
Ibbetson: privity has been a part of English law since the 13th century; // Roman law,
civilian systems. Notwithstanding will theory of contract more flexibility in civilian
systems. English law ultimately leant towards privity.
Tweddle v Atkinson (1861) / QB
Facts: Mr Tweddle married Miss Guy. Before wedding, Mr G promised ipar punya dia Mr
T Snr that they would give Mr T marriage portions verbally. Mr T to give Mr T jnr £200;
Mr T snr to give Mr T jnr £100 per written post-wedding agreement. T jnr sued Mr G’s
estate; claim failed.
Wightman J: No stranger to the consideration can take advantage of a contract, although
made for his benefit
Crompton J: the consideration must move from the party entitled to sue upon the contract.
Would be monstrous if a party could sue but not be sued in turn.
Blackburn J: Rejected the argument that son could sue ‘when the consideration moves
from a father, and the contract is for the benefit of his son’ because of the ‘natural love
and affection between the father and the son’
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller christan1911. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for £5.24. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
80364 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now