Summary
Summary Interpretation and Rectification
- Module
- Contract law
- Institution
- Cambridge University (CAM)
2i Contract Law notes
[Show more]
Content preview
Contract Supervision 5: Mistake and TermsII (Interpretation; Rectification)
Casebook
McKendrick TCM Chapter 11: Interpretation
INTRODUCTION
Interpretation matters from a legal drafting angle; post-Canada Steamship [1952],
lawyers must be careful when drafting exclusion contracts. Hobhouse J per EE Caledonia
Ltd v Orbit Valve Co Europe [1993] – courts assume commercial contracts drafted with
legal advice therefore courts will apply case law directly.
EVOLUTION: LITERALISM TO CONTEXTUALISM
Lovell and Christmas Ltd v Wall [1911] per Cozens-Hardy MR – language of the contract
alone except eg wrt trade terms or technical terms – may then call in industry experts
or else courts will apply four corners approach.
Turning point: Prenn v Simmonds [1971] HL – context key – must look at ‘matrix of facts’.
Reardon Smith Line Ltd v Yngvar Hangsen-Tangsen [1976] per Lord Wilberforce – No
contracts are ‘made in a vacuum’.
Lord Hoffman’s Restatement:
Investors Compensation Scheme v West Bromwich Building Society [1998] 1 WLR 896
1. Interpretation – what document would mean to ‘reasonable person’ with ‘all the
background knowledge which would have reasonably been available to the
parties [at the time]…’
2. Background = ‘matrix of fact’; this ‘includes absolutely anything’ which could
reasonably affect interpretation of contract.
3. Negotiations excluded: only allowed in rectification action
4. Words’ dictionary meaning is not the same as what document would convey to
reasonable person eg wrt ambiguity
5. ‘Natural and ordinary meaning’ – rebuttable presumption against mistake
Therefore, ‘any claim’ actually = ‘any claim sounding from recission’
Scope of Lord Hoffman’s Principles
Builds on Prenn; not truly revolutionary. However, how can dicta of even Lord Hoffmann
set aside old SC/HL/PC cases like Canadian Steamship?
Objective nature of the test –
Factual matrix: clarified in BCCI v Ali [2001] UKHL 8 – not ‘no limit’ but ‘no
conceptual limit’ wrt may be relevant
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller christan1911. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for £5.28. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
80796 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now