Extremely high-detailed and comprehensive A* philosophy notes including not only the content but also a whole range of relevant scholars, responses and pros and cons of the different arguments. Everything you would need for this topic!
Logical problem of evil
Presented by Epicurus, it highlights an inconsistency between the divine attributes of God and the
presence of evil. An all-powerful God would be able to prevent evil and suffering, an all-loving and
wholly good God would care enough to prevent evil and suffering, and an omniscient God would
know about evil and suffering in the world and know how to create a world without it. Therefore
these attributes are incompatible with the existence of evil and suffering.
Counter-arguments:
- Suffering is used to test people and their reactions determine if they should go to heaven or
not.
- The story of Job shows that evil and suffering are beyond human understanding but are part
of God’s plan.
- It allows us to grow closer to Jesus who also suffered.
- Without evil, there can be no good. If everything in the universe was small, nothing would
be big.
Hume’s inconsistent triad is a version of the logical problem of evil. It has three elements that are
incompatible all together: omnipotence, omnibenevolence, and the existence of evil.
Solutions to the inconsistent triad:
- Process theology, developed by Hartshorne and Whitehead, chooses to remove the
attribute of omnipotence, so God becomes an empathetic fellow sufferer.
- Others, such as Dostoyevsky advocate that God must be malevolent and not worthy of
worship.
- Mary Eddy Baker removes the statement element of ‘evil exists’, arguing that pain, evil and
sickness are illusions and not real. Suffering is all in the mind.
Evidential problem of evil
William Rowe argues that the overwhelming amount of evil in the world that lacks any purpose is
evidence against God. An omniscient, omnipotent and wholly good God would not allow ‘seemingly
pointless human and animal suffering’. He uses the example of a fawn burnt and trapped by a forest
fire that “lies alive in terrible agony for several days” before dying. Belief in God is irrational. This
argument evidences the non-existence of God but does not prove it.
Support:
- Richard Dawkins highlights that even without humans, the suffering of the animal kingdom
is immense.
- Dostoyevsky argues that a God who allows theisextent of innocent suffering is not worth
worshipping. There is nothing that could justify a five-year-old girl being raped, beaten and
strangled to death. No good comes from it.
Counter-arguments:
- Swinburne argues that such suffering provides greater motivation to e.g find cures for
disease. Suffering allows for human accomplishment and advancement.
- In heaven, everyone is rewarded for their suffering.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller roberte-s. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for £6.69. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
