100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Previously searched by you
Previously searched by you
logo
Essay Plan: Evaluate the view that the presidential nomination process is fit for purpose £5.48
Add to cart
Quickly navigate to
Preview
  2.  
  3. PEARSON (PEARSON)
  4.  
  5. Government And Politics
  6.  
  7. USA

Other

Essay Plan: Evaluate the view that the presidential nomination process is fit for purpose
 4 views  0 purchase

An A* A Level Essay Plan for Politics A Level Paper 3 (USA) Contains 3 arguments and 3 corresponding counter-arguments, packed with recent examples

Preview 1 out of 2  pages

Document information

  • October 23, 2023
  • 2
  • 2023/2024
  • Other
  • Unknown

Subjects

Written for

All documents for this subject (27)

Seller

avatar-seller
oliverdawson

Content preview

Presidential nomination process



Incumbency advantage – not fit for purpose

 Obama – John Wolfe – 117,000 votes, 1.7% popular vote
 Trump – Bill Weld – 2.35% popular vote, 1 delegate
 Money – Joe Manchin got $300,000 from companies after voting against Build Back Better
 Pork barrelling – Big Dig, Boston - $14 billion for 3.5 miles

Third parties can change campaigns of incumbents – for purpose

 HW Bush 1992, Pat Buchanan
o Pushed Bush more right wing
o Uncovered faults in tax rises and defence spending cuts
o ‘Read my lips – no new tax rises’
o Buchanan – 3 million votes – 24% popular vote



Caucuses – not fit for purpose

 Attracts extreme fringes – inaccurate representation
o 2020, Democrats held 4 caucuses, Bernie Sanders won 2 outright and came second
in other 2
o Of his largest win, Sanders got 53% vote in North Dakota, closest to him was Biden
on 39%

Primaries have extreme results as well – fit for purpose

 2020, California primary, Sanders won with 36% vote
 2020, Wyoming caucus, Biden won 72% vote




Length of time – not fit for purpose

 2015, Ted Cruz announced he was running 11 months before first primary, Obama still had
just under 2 years left in office
 Biden announced he was funning April 2019, first primary August 2020

Debates + test – fit for purpose

 Length of campaign is a good test for physical/mental ability to do the job e.g. Biden
 Democratic National Party scheduled 12 debates from June 2019 to March 2020

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller oliverdawson. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £5.48. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

53068 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now

Start selling

Recently viewed by you

Summary ·

(0)

Samenvatting/Summary - History of Museums Universiteit Leiden Jaar 2
£5.48
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added