100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary AQA Psychology notes - A2 RESEARCH METHODS (A* Student) £2.99
Add to cart

Summary

Summary AQA Psychology notes - A2 RESEARCH METHODS (A* Student)

1 review
 421 views  6 purchases

This document covers the content that is specifically studied for A2 AQA Psychology Research Methods - the following sub-topics are covered: 1. Correlations 2. Content analysis 3. Case studies 4. Pilot studies 5. Single-blind procedures 6. Double-blind procedures 7. Peer review 8. Reliabi...

[Show more]

Preview 2 out of 10  pages

  • Unknown
  • November 28, 2017
  • 10
  • 2016/2017
  • Summary
book image

Book Title:

Author(s):

  • Edition:
  • ISBN:
  • Edition:
All documents for this subject (287)

1  review

review-writer-avatar

By: lucygrace01 • 6 year ago

avatar-seller
psych123
Correlations
 Correlation: a mathematical technique/ measure in which a researcher investigates an association, the strength and direction of
relationships between two or more variables being measured (co-variables)
 A correlation is a method used to analyse data but it is not research methods, it can use methods such as self-report and
observations
 Co-variables: variables instigated within the correlation e.g. height and weight. They are NOT referred to as IVs or DVs because a
correlation investigation the assocaiton between the variables, rather than trying to show a cause and effect relationship
 Correlations are plotted on a scatter gram: one co-variable form the x-axis and the other the y-axis. Each point/ dot on the graph is
the x and y position of each co-variable
 When conducting a study using a correlational analyse, you need to produce a correlational hypothesis that states the expected
relationship between co-variables NOT difference/ significant increase or decrease

Types of correlation:
 Positive correlation: as one co-variable increases, so does the other. The variables change in the same direction. E.g. the number of
people in a room and noise are positively correlated
 Negative correlation: As one co-variable increases, the other decreases. The variables change in opposite directions. E.g. the number
of people in a room and the amount of personal space are negatively correlated
 Zero correlation: When there is no relationship between co-variables. E.g. the number of people in the UK and the total daily rainfall
in Peru
 Linear correlation: a systematic relationship between co-variables that is defined by a straight line
 Curvilinear correlation: A non-linear relationship between co-variables e.g. arousal and performance do not have a linear/ straight
relationship – performance on many tasks is depressed when arousal is too high/ too low, but is high when arousal is moderate.

Correlation co-efficient:
 A number between -1 and +1 that tells us how closely the co-variables in a correlational analysis are related
 Maximum value of 1.0 (+1.0 is a perfect positive correlation and -1.0 is a perfect negative correlation)
 The + or – sign before e.g. .76 shows whether it is a positive or negative correlation
 The co-efficient (number) tells us how closely the co-variables are related: -.76 is just a closely correlated as +.76
 -.76 means that as one variable increases, the other decreases (negative correlation)
 +.76 means that both variables increase together (positive correlation)
 A statistical test is used to calculate the correlation coefficient

The difference between correlations and experiments:
 In an experiment: the researcher controls/ manipulees an IV to measure the effect on the DV – as a result of this change in one
variable, it is possible to infer that the IV causes any observed changes to the DV
 In a correlation, there no manipulation of one variable so it not possible to establish a cause and effect between one co-variable
and another (even if a strong positive correlation was found)
 Other variables can affect/influence one of the co-variables (intervening variables)

STRENGTHS LIMITATIONS
 Correlations are a useful preliminary tool for research: by  Due to a lack of manipulation and control, correlational studies can
assessing the strength & direction of a relations, they provide a only tell us how variables are related but not why. Correlations
precise & quantifiable measure of how two-variables are cannot demonstrate cause and effect between variables and
related. This may suggest ideas for possible future research if therefore we do not know which co-variable is causing the other to
variables are strongly related/ demonstrate an interesting change. Establishing the direction of the effect is an issue.
pattern
 Correlations are often used as a starting point to assess possible  It is possible that another untested variable is causing the
patterns between variables before researchers commit to an relationship between the two co-variables – an intervening variable.
experimental study A third variable problem. Therefore, people often misinterpret
 They are relatively quick and economical to carry out correlations and assume a caudal relationship has been
demonstrated – leads to public misunderstandings
 There is no need for a controlled environment and no  As with experiments, studies using correlational analysis may lack
manipulation of variables is required internal/ external validity – sample may lack generalisability
 Data collection by others (secondary data such as government  Correlations show linear relationships but may not reflect
statistics) can be used, which correlations are less time- curvilinear ones
consuming than experiments
 Correlations are used when is practically/ ethically impossible to
manipulate variables (they are only measured). By avoiding
manipulation, they are more true to life and ethical than doing
experiments

, Content analysis

 A kind of observational study in which behaviour is observed indirectly in written and verbal material
 A detailed analysis is made of, for example, books, diaries, or TV programmes
 May involve either qualitative or quantitative analysis
 The aim is to summarise and describe forms of communication in a systematic way so overall conclusions
can be drawn

1. Sample/ sampling method: what material to sample and how frequently e.g. time sampling
(recording behaviour that happens in a timeframe) or event sampling (code an event every time to
happens). Other considerations include deciding which TV channels/ books to include, how many
programmes, what length of time. Does the researcher look at every 5th page, select books
randomly form a library or analyse ads on the TV every 30 seconds and note when certain
behaviours occur?
2. Method of recording data: coding the data e.g. using behavioural categories (dividing a target
behaviour such as stress or aggression, into a subset of behaviours) or a coding frame (a systematic
method for recording observations in which an individual’s behaviours are given a code for ease of
recording)
3. Method of representing / coding the data: coding is the process of placing quantitative or
qualitative data into categories and is the initial stage to identify coding units to analyse the data.
First you either use time/ event sampling and then record data either by counting instances of each
coding unit (quantitative analysis) or by describing examples in each category (qualitative analysis)



STRENGTHS LIMITATIONS
 Tends to have high ecological validity because it is  Observer bias reduced the objectivity and validity of
based on observations of what people actually do findings because different observers may interpret
– real communications that are current and the meaning of the behavioural categories differently.
relevant, such as newspapers or books It is important to ensure that if there are multiple
researchers, they apply criteria in the same way by
calculating inter-observer reliability (inter-rater
reliability)
 When sources can be retained/ accessed by  Likely to be culture biased because interpretation of
others, the content analysis can be replicated and verbal/ written content will be affected by the
therefore observations can be tested for reliability language and culture of the observer and behavioural
categories used
 People tend to be studied indirectly outside of the
context which information was collated: danger that
the researcher may attribute opinions & motivations
to the speaker/ writer that were not intended
originally
  Compare to the thematic analysis

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller psych123. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £2.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

53340 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now

Start selling
£2.99  6x  sold
  • (1)
Add to cart
Added