Lecture notes
International Investment Law (Introduction)
- Institution
- Liverpool John Moores University (LJMU)
Part 2B of International Investment Law Notes.
[Show more]
Seller
Follow
Content preview
Lecture – Part 2BRegulatory brain drain –
PRA, FCA worth looking at graduate roles
Banks now have incentives that pay off in the medium term
Justifications for the global regulatory architecture
There are at least three related rationales
If we perceive ourselves as potential losers in an environment of regulatory
competition
If we thinks regulatory competition might trigger a downward spiral in regulatory
standards
If we think poor regulation and supervision in other jurisdictions will result in
financial turmoil, the effects of which will spills over into our jurisdicitokn (bnegative
externalities)
Note that if each of these rationales is framed from the perspective of esxisting
public actors (i.e states which would need to cede authority
A note on regulatory competition
The conventional framework: regulatory competition as a joint maximisation
problem between issuers/manahers and investoras
Heavily influenced by the debate surrounding regulatory competition for corporate
charters
The prediction: in a competitive environment, issuers will select a level of
investor protection where the benefit of the higher offering price outweighs the
higher costs of protection
• At least in theory, therefore, competition may lead to the maximisation of
joint
welfare
• And more efficient regulatory regimes
Positive theory
Perspective of the issuers, creators of the financial priducts on one side
Negative theory is from the investors
Where youvew got a highly competitive environment the issuer will increased the price of
the product because they will afford the investors greater investor protection, this way, the
issuers will get more money and the investors receive greater investor protection, leads to
more efficient regulatory regimes
However it does not predict whether we are going to have a race to the top,
In and of itself, however, this framework does not predict whether we should
expect to observe a ‘race to the top’ or ‘race to the bottom’ in investor
protection
• Romano (1998) versus Fox (1999)
, Lecture – Part 2B
• See also Coffee (2002) and, specifically, his ‘bonding’ hypothesis
• More broadly, is the issuer/investor joint welfare maximisation problem the
most appropriate framework in all cases?
• What about cases where interests are aligned?
• And what about externalities?
The design of global regulatory architecture
Putting aside the social desirability of an international regulatory architecture
(at least for the moment), the fact is that we already have one
• So who are the key players within the existing international regulatory
architecture?
• Brummer (2011) provides us with a useful taxonomy:
• Bilateral and Multilateral Memoranda of Understanding
• International Standard-Setters (e.g. Basel Committee on Banking
Supervision)
• Cross-functional Networks (e.g. Group 20)
• Other international institutions (e.g. International Monetary Fund)
These institutions coordinate across a number of dimensions, including:
• Cross-border information flow – this is in direct response to the issue of the direct
international markets, if there is merging risks is some kind of forum network
exchange on where countries can say, this rism is happening, we wish to work as
international partners
• Cross-border banking supervision
• Cross-border crisis response
• Functional harmonisation – in line with the basil committee, trying to harmonise
what the banking regulations are. – limit regulatory arbitrage opportunities
The current international regulatory architecture is based predominantly on
‘soft law’ mechanisms
• Standards, guidelines, and interpretations (produced by e.g. Basel
Committee on Banking Supervision
• Not binding or enforceable under international law, but theoretically capable of
influencing behaviour through reputational enforcement mechanisms
• Peer review processes
• Developing countries may adopt standards because they are easily
identifiable — national regulators may lack the expertise and information
• ‘Comply or explain’ obligations
• ‘Name and shame’ strategies
• And, theoretically at least, removal from the group
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller lochridge. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for £2.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
79751 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now