Opposition to government 1918-89
- Eisner’s inability to unite socialist parties led to his
Threats from the extreme left 1918-23 assassination in Feb 1919
- Bavarian Soviet Republic w/ ‘Red Army’ of workers set up by
KPD opposition to Weimar Eugen Leviné
- Believed that the est. of parliamentary democracy fell short of - Freikorps and army moved into bavaria and crushed the
its party aims republic → White terror
- Wanted a Marxist revolution and the creation of a Communist - >1000 deaths
state - Resulted in extreme shift from far left to far right politics in
- Inspired by the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution Bavaria
- Complete rejection of the Weimar constitution
- Was not willing to co-op with other parties, including the SPD German October Summer 1923
- L-wing rev’tary action following the hyperinflationary crisis
Revolutionary disturbances - KPD and SPD formed coalitions in Saxony and Thuringia
- KPD made military preparations for an uprising w/ ‘Proletarian
Spartacist Uprising Jan 1919 Hundreds’
- Spartacist faction split from the USPD split to form the KPD - Stresemann’s gov’t ordered the army to crush the units and
- Uprising began w/ the occupation of the SPD’s newspaper regional gov’ts were re-created w/o communists
offices
- Response: Ebert called in the freikorps Was there a Red threat?
- Spartacists continued to occupy public buildings, formed a - Actions made many suspicious of a Bolshevik-inspired Red
rev’tary committee and called for general strike threat
- Revolt crushed by street fighting → led to enforcement of R-wing propaganda
- >100 died - Extreme left posed less of a threat - was merely superficial
- Effects: Weaknesses of the left:
→ spartacists seen as detached from Weimar politics 1. Bad coordination
→ Ebert shocked by the brutality of the freikorps and powerless in - Still were unable to take advantage of vulnerable situations, e.g
restraining them hyperinflationary crisis
- SPD and KPD would never co-op after the Spartacist uprising
Red Bavaria Feb-May 1919 2. Poor leadership
- Bavarian monarchy collapsed → USPD leader Kurt Eisner - Freikorps killed off or captured extreme left leaders early on in
the republic
replaced them
, Opposition to government 1918-89
- Later leadership made up of internal division and disagreement - Existed before 1914 but the effects of the war attracted more
on tactics ppl
3. Concessions - 70 small splinter nat’list parties, e.g. Nazi Party
- Weimar gov’t played on differences and worked to split the left - Bavaria = hotspot for splinter groups after Red Bavaria
- E.g. Kapp putsch 1920 - German Workers’ Party
4. Repression
- Authorities systematically repressed the rebels w/ considerable Freikorps
brutality - Attracted the brutal elements of German militarism
- 200 paramilitary units demobilised by 1919
Threats from the extreme right 1918-23 - Employed by the gov’t to suppress the extreme left
- Committed to the restoration of authoritarian rule
Ideology - Prepared to use violence and murder to intimidate others
- Was not organised, apart from the shared sense of nationalism
- Anti-democracy - rejection the Weimar system and its Consul organisation
principles as it was weak - Political assassination group
- Anti-Marxism - communism threatened trad’tl values and - Carried out 354 political murders 1919-22
o/ship of property and wealth - Responsible for murdering Matthias Erxberger, Walther
- Authoritarianism - wanted to restore the dictatorial imperial Rathenau and Karl Gareis
regime
- Nationalism - the core of the right; Germany’s pride had been Uprisings
hurt after the ToV, thus the reinforcement of the ‘stab in the Kapp Putsch March 1920
back’ myth Events
- Kapp and Luttwitz concerned by the demobilisation of troops
Organisations being reinforced by the ToV
DNVP - Encouraged 12,000 troops to march on Berlin and seize main
- Coalition of nat’list-minded old imperial conservative parties buildings
- Contained extremist and racist elements - Installed a new gov’t
- Appealed to the m/class, landowners and industrialists - Germany army did not resist the putsch, despite orders from
- Largest party in the Reichstag for the extreme right - 15% in Erbert and Chancellor
1920 election - Putsch collapsed after the SPD called for a general strike
Aftermath
Racist nationalism - Putsch highlights the weaknesses of Weimar and the ease of
overthrowing the gov’t
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller anekaogden. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for £5.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.