100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Complete lecture notes Linguistics 2 (PL2LING2) £7.49   Add to cart

Lecture notes

Complete lecture notes Linguistics 2 (PL2LING2)

 3 views  0 purchase

Complete, concise, and accurate lecture notes summarising the key content from Linguistics 2

Preview 2 out of 11  pages

  • December 24, 2023
  • 11
  • 2021/2022
  • Lecture notes
  • Dr ian cunnings
  • All classes
All documents for this subject (1)
avatar-seller
imaangill22
28/09/2021 PL2LING2 – Lecture 1 functional categories



Constituency – some strings of words in a clause can group together to form a grammatical unit

Constituency test – constituents can be co-ordinated with others of the same type e.g., NP + NP



X-bar theory – specifier, adjunct (recursion) & complement levels

Generalised X-bar rules – 2 versions for each levels & can be used to describe every language



English uses the specifier rule on the left, can use either
adjunct rule and uses the complement rule on the right



Specifier rule requires the specifier to be phrasal –
issues with determiners as they are a single word

Led to new X-bar category of DP to fit determiners into
the theory



Note on PPs – often adjuncts but phrases beginning with ‘of’
behave more like complements (need to be next to the
noun)

Note of DP – possessive ‘s is treated as D is tree structure



How does S fit into X-bar theory?

Head determines core properties e.g., definite vs indefinite

If head property of an S is to be tense/finiteness then TP needs to be an X-bar category

Tense can be marked with verb suffix or AUX (complementary distribution – one of the other &
behave syntactically the same)

AUX = overt T while a suffix = null T

With TP there is no need for S at the top now

Specifier of TP = DP Complement of TP = VP



CPs in embedded clauses e.g., that, whether, if act as complementisers

The complement of CP is TP

Complementisers can be overt or null e.g., John said (that) Bill ate the cake

, Assume there is a CP in every clause so CP is at the top of each tree

05/10/2021 PL2LING2 – Lecture 2 semantic relations



Arguments – constituent that participates in an action expressed by a V

Arguments are obligatory so adjuncts are not arguments

John slept – intransitive verb

John bought a bed – transitive verb

John gave the book to Susan – ditransitive verb



Transitivity, subcategorisation and selectional restrictions are types of lexical restrictions

Subcategorisation – limits types of arguments e.g. remember can have DP or CP like Sarah
remembered the answer vs Sarah remembered that you have the answer while hit can only have DP
e.g. Sarah hit the ball

Selectional restrictions – limits semantic properties of arguments e.g. ‘love’/’kill’ requires animacy so
the criminal killed the pebble does not violate subcategorisation or argument structure but it is the
noun type that doesn’t make sense

Semantic relations – constituent role played in the action expressed by the V e.g., agent, goal etc.



Constituent can be assigned more than one semantic relation

Theta role – bundle of semantic relations associated with one argument

Theta criterion - theta roles & arguments must match one-to-one (need the right number & type)

Theta grid – if not adequately filled or too many arguments - ungrammatical

The Projection Principle – lexical info needs to be syntactically represented at all times

Grammaticality – determined by X-bar theory (syntax) & idiosyncratic properties (lexical) of verbs



Two types of ‘it’

The boy saw the cake and then ate it – anaphoric – assigned a theta role

It rained for hours – expletive – violated that criterion – obligatory but has no theta role



Expletive ‘it’ – unclear reference, empty theta grid e.g. it rained & it was obvious etc.

Subject ‘it’ still required – syntactic requirements overrides semantic requirements of a criterion

The Extended Project Principle – all clauses must have a subject (specifier of TP) & lexical info is
syntactically represented at all levels

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller imaangill22. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £7.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

67474 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now

Start selling
£7.49
  • (0)
  Add to cart