ANTHONY FLEW
1. Parable – cannot falsify existence of gardener by sense experience, therefore meaningless
2. Explanation – parable starts as asserton statement of fact/belief) that something gardener)
exists. Then has been qualifed so that it cannot be falsifed, to such an extent that nothing
remains of the original asserton (what remains of your original asserton?” - becomes a
(picture preference” = only meaningful to believer, and it is therefore meaningless) – “dies a
death of a thousand qualifcatons”
3. Theological Uterance – (those who uter such sentences intend them to express assertons”,
e.g. (God loves us”, yet believer will qualify to allow nothing to falsify
4. Assertions –“now to assert that such and such is the case is necessarily equivalent to denying
that such and such is not the case”, e.g. x=y simultaneously denies x =/= y. To
understand/check an asserton we can fnd out what would hypothetcally negate the
statement e.g. x=y is disproven if x=/=y) – (if there is nothing which a putatve asserton
denies then there is nothing which it asserts either, and so it is not really an asserton.”
5. Conclusion – there is nothing that believers will allow to conclusively negate the existence of
God – “no conceivable event….the occurrence of which would be admited by sophistcated
religious people to be a sufcient reason for concluding ‘there wasn’t a God afer all’”
R.M.HARE
1. Parable – lunatc and dons, regardless of all evidence to the contrary, lunatc cannot be
swayed from his beliefs. Lunatccs beliefs cannot be falsifed and are therefore meaningless
according to Flew, BUT there is stll a marked diference between the lunatc and a sane
person, so therefore his belief is not meaningless.
2. Blik = our interpretaton of the world that infuences how we react to it – (blik does not
consist of an asserton or system of them, but nevertheless it is very important to have right
blik” – sane vs insane
3. Car analogy - believes steering will fail = blik not asserton) – stll meaningful as impacts, (I
should never go in a motor car”. Cannot be falsifed – (my blik is compatble with any fnite
number if such tests”
4. Flew – not critcising Flewcs argument, simply the (mistake of the positon which Flew selects
for atack” – should not be interpretng religious statements as asserton but rather as bliks.
5. Atheists – upbringing infuences religion – it is hard for people to know what they really
believe superfcial abandonment of religion is not true disbelief) – “they think they have
abandoned the whole thing”
6. Conclusion – diference between Flew and aarecs parables – (I mind…I am unable to share
the explorer’s detachment” – people have an emotonal connecton to God-talk/ religion, and
therefore it is meaningful, despite being unfalsifable.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller emmabird. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for £4.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
