Summary
Summary OCR A-Level English Literature The Merchants Tale Critical Analysis
- Institution
- OCR
OCR A-Level English Literature The Merchants Tale Critical Analysis
[Show more]
Content preview
‘The Merchant’s Tale’ Critical InterpretationsIndividual Critics
• J S P. Tatlock (1936):
o ‘For unrelieved acidity… the tale is one of the must surprising pieces of unlovely
virtuosity’
o ‘Religion itself is bemocked’
• Edward Wagenknecht (1959):
o ‘Like Januarie, the Merchant never truly knows what marriage is because he is blinded by
his anger… the Merchant speaks in a frenzy of contempt and hatred’
o ‘The hatred for women; the contempt is for himself and all other fools who will not take
warning by example’
o ‘Januarie’s blindness is a physical counterpart of the ignorance of marriage and of women
he has shown all along’
• Karl Wentersdorf (1965) – ‘the tale is a demonstration of the reprehensible lechery and
folly of men’
• Emerson Brown Jr (1968) – ‘the garden is a representation of May’s body’
• David Aers (1980):
o ‘The males organise a market transaction in which woman is a commodity and marriage
the particular institution which will secure the transaction’
o ‘The text justifies that most marriages in the middle and upper social groups were
transactions in which human beings, their labour-power, and their sexual-power were sold’
• Gail Ashton (1998) – ‘without doubt this portrayal of married love is firmly on the side of
the female’
• Stephanie Tolliver (2001):
o ‘Januarie shops for his bride’
o ‘The Merchant’s misogyny is a product of his marital disillusionment’
o ‘May is made of masculine fantasy’
o ‘Januarie’s inability to analyse May’s deceit is essentially his refusal to accept it’
o ‘The Merchant bought more than he bargained for when he entered into the marriage’
o ‘The mirror Januarie sets up in the marketplace can only reflect the physical appearance of
women who pass it, not their intelligence, opinions of personality’
o ‘Januarie will never be able to see May’s adultery because he has never been able to
perceive her as anything other than his possession’
31
, • C David. Benson (2004):
o ‘The Merchant’s complaints are a conventional piece of medieval antifeminism’
o ‘Januarie is one of Chaucer’s greatest achievements in moral characterisation, but the
pilgrim Merchant is little more than a stock figure. The tale warns us to trust the tale, not
the teller’
o ‘The tale introduces a new standard of judgement (from the bible and classics) to the
world of fabliau that exposes the corruption of January and May’
• Derek Pearsall (2004):
o ‘There are many subtle anticipations and echoings: Januarie’s comparison of his sexuality
to evergreen laurel is echoed in the laurel in the garden where he is cuckolded; the wax to
which he compares the pliability of the desired wife is echoed in the wax his wife uses to
make a copy of the key to the garden’
o ‘January himself is something more than the traditional senex amans. To the disgust
traditionally associated with that figure, Chaucer adds a lurid physical reality’
o ‘The images of sexual possession as eating, the fantasies of prolonged rape, the haste, the
barrelful’s of aphrodisiacs give a partly comic effect, but always with un undertone of
disgust and repulsion’
• Holly Crocker – ‘May’s conduct demonstrates that the feminine passivity upon which
masculine performances of agency depend is of course an act’
• Elaine Hansen:
o ‘May is devised out of Januarie’s thoughts, just as Eve is out of Adam’s’
o ‘Early critics review May as a completely unfeeling wife because many were unable to
accept her vanquishing over the senex amans’
• Priscilla Martin:
o ‘The male exploitation of economic power for erotic purpose’
o ‘January believes he is inhabiting a romance which in finally bitterly exposed as a
fabliaux’
• John Thorne:
o ‘The tale draws attention to the fate of a sacred authoritative text in the hands of a naïve
enthusiast’
o ‘Januarie’s being of religious authority to his own selfish purposes leaves religion
untouched but adds to our sense of his delusion and error’
• Katy Lee – ‘women are repeatedly compared to food and drink in the Tales, particularly by
the unhappily married Merchant’
32
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller anish24shah. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for £3.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
73243 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now