100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Previously searched by you
Previously searched by you
logo
PVL 3704 ASSGN 1 semester 1 2024 £2.25   Add to cart
Quickly navigate to
Preview
  2.  
  3. University Of South Africa (Unisa)
  4.  
  5. Enrichment liability and estop

Other

PVL 3704 ASSGN 1 semester 1 2024

 9 views  0 purchase
  • Module
  • Enrichment liability and estop
  • Institution
  • University Of South Africa (Unisa)

QUESTION 1 Discuss the general requirement that the defendant’s enrichment must have been at the expense of the plaintiff. Refer in your answer to case law. (15) In legal terms, the requirement that the defendant's enrichment must have been at the expense of the plaintiff is...

[Show more]

Preview 2 out of 7  pages

Document information

  • February 2, 2024
  • 7
  • 2023/2024
  • Other
  • Unknown

Subjects

  • memo

Written for

  • University of South Africa (Unisa)
  • Enrichment liability and estop
All documents for this subject (1)

Seller

avatar-seller
jenniferrichards

Reviews received

Content preview

ENRICHMENT LIABILITY
AND ESTOPEL PVL 3704
ASSIGNMENT 01


3/12/2024
DUE DATE :12 MARCH 2024
FIRST SEMESTER 2024

,  PLAGIARISM FREE

 COMPLEETE ANSWERS

 100 % TRUSTED WORKINGS

 EXPLANATIONS AND SOLUTIONS

 ALL QUESTIONS ANSWERED FOR YOU




QUESTION 1 Discuss the general requirement that the defendant’s
enrichment must have been at the expense of the plaintiff. Refer in
your answer to case law. (15)



In legal terms, the requirement that the defendant's enrichment must
have been at the expense of the plaintiff is often associated with the
principle of unjust enrichment. This principle is based on the idea that it
would be unfair for one party to be enriched at the expense of another
without legal justification.



One notable case that illustrates this principle is Twinsectra Ltd v
Yardley [2002] UKHL 12. In this case, Lord Hoffmann outlined the
elements of unjust enrichment, including the requirement that the
defendant's enrichment must have been at the expense of the plaintiff.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller jenniferrichards. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £2.25. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

75057 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now

Start selling
£2.25
  • (0)
  Add to cart