Summary
Summary Difference between Political and Legal Constitutionalism
- Institution
- University Of Oxford
What is the difference between Political and Legal Constitutionalism? Does the UK have a legal or political constitution
[Show more]
Seller
FollowContent preview
Legal and political constitutionalism: a quickoverview
Note that:
we owe the labels ‘legal constitutionalist’ and ‘political
constitutionalist’ to the latter group of writers. While some (e.g.
Allan) have embraced the ‘legal constitutionalist’ tag, it was
introduced as a name for a constructed counterpart for the position
defended by self-professed political constitutionalists.
both camps tend to accept that they advocating the superiority of
one aspect of the constitution (or of constitutions) rather than
suggesting that any one system perfectly instantiates ‘a political
constitution’ or ‘a legal constitution’ – though this subtlety tends to
get lost when people remark, for example, that the UK’s
constitution is moving from being a political constitution towards
being a legal constitution.
Political constitutionalists emphasize:
Ubiquity of disagreement and confict
o Griffith: ‘the rights which are sought to be protected by the
many and varied protagonists of the Bill of Rights are
themselves also many and varied…. The mere statement of
these rival claims is a statement about confict.’
o The whole point of democracy is to settle inevitable political
disagreements in the fairest way possible – one way of
understanding the legal argument we can cut through this confict
to fnd some basis of our political understanding of what is due to
everyone <- Grifiths believes this is a fction, only repeating the
same conficts at a more foundational level
Majoritarian democracy as ‘more legitimate and efective then the
judicial process at resolving these disagreements’ (Bellamy) – a
procedural way of remediating on an ongoing basis these conficts,
democratic means more legitimate than judicial means – democratic
process obviously isn’t perfect/ideal – argue we should focus on
improving the democratic process rather than passing to judiciary
Political accountability
o Griffith: ‘political decisions should be taken by politicians. In
a society like ours this means by people who are removable.
It is an obvious corollary of this that the responsibility and
accountability of our rulers should be real and not
fictitious…. It is not by attempting to restrict the legal
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller georgiapantazides. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for £2.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
67866 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now