100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
A level RE essay on ‘Apply Act utilitarianism to the issue of animal testing (20)’ £4.49   Add to cart

Essay

A level RE essay on ‘Apply Act utilitarianism to the issue of animal testing (20)’

 7 views  0 purchase

Well written in depth essay with examples and other philosophers such as singer.

Preview 1 out of 2  pages

  • April 25, 2024
  • 2
  • 2022/2023
  • Essay
  • Unknown
  • A
All documents for this subject (4)
avatar-seller
jaminakhanom
Apply Act Utilitarnism to the issue of animal testing (20)


Jeremy Bentham formulated Act Utilitarianism, otherwise known as classical utilitarianism in his
book: "an introduction to principles of morals and legislation" to devise a system which would
challenge social injustices and create a more objective theory of ethical decisions. His resulting
theory is action-centered and teleological, with the purpose of each action being to maximise
pleasure of happiness. As such, Bentham was widely regarded as a hedonist as he believed
that goodness was largely synonymous with pleasure. Act Utilitarianism rests on the principle of
utility which states that the most useful action in any situation is the one which produces the
most amount of happiness. Animal experimentation refers to the use of animals to learn how to
medically treat humans.

Bentham would potentially refuse the use of animal testing. Singer said that "to discriminate
against something solely on the account of their species is a form of discrimination", it is a form
of speciesism. This refers to the use of animal testing since animals are living beings who
experience pain and suffering just like humans. Therefore, producing the greatest amount of
happiness, whilst simultaneously causing pain and suffering would be discouraged by Bentham.
Bentham was a rights activist, who believed that it is important to consider the suffering caused
by medical testing. Hence, why medically testing may be seen as ethically wrong due to the
amount of pain it causes to many animals.

Bentham considered an animal's capacity for suffering to be the benchmark by which we judge
how we treat others. He argued, "the question is not, can they reason? Nor can they talk? But
can they suffer?", meaning if something is not okay for a human being, it is also not okay for
animals. The Hedonic Calculus can be applied to achieve the maximum quantity of happiness.
A scenario is Bill has a congenital heart defect, a thirteen-year-old in heart failure, and needs a
heart transplant, but there are not enough hearts, however, research into xenotransplantation (a
genetically altered animal organ) could save Bill, but pigs have died in the testing and
transplanting process. According to the Hedonic Calculus, animal testing is ethically permissible
as the duration of pain is short lived for the pigs, and Bill is young, so has many years of life to
live. The extent to which people experience happiness and pleasure is that Bill's family and
friends will be affected by his death, so animal testing should be done to increase their quantity
of pleasure and happiness, as the pig does not have a family to worry about him. Richness is
how much more happiness this will lead to in the future. Evidently, Bill could continue to
experience happiness as he lives a normal life, and the pig's pain enables others like Bill to be
treated.

However, according to the Hedonic Calculus, animal testing is not acceptable as animal
experimentation is unreliable, leading to minimal future happiness and it is time consuming to
develop treatments, so Bill must wait and is not being helped (richness). The extent is that
millions of animals are reared for testing, so are created to withstand no happiness, only pain.
According to Langley, the known differences between mice and humans is 67%, which makes

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller jaminakhanom. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £4.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

83225 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now

Start selling
£4.49
  • (0)
  Add to cart