100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary One page chart showing disqualifying factors for an easement - three Ps £2.99   Add to cart

Summary

Summary One page chart showing disqualifying factors for an easement - three Ps

 14 views  0 purchase

One page chart showing disqualifying factors for easements. The three Ps are set out: Possession, payment & Permission. Each is set out with key points, cases and tests. Designed for revision and use during open book and MCQ exams.

Preview 1 out of 2  pages

  • May 5, 2024
  • 2
  • 2022/2023
  • Summary
All documents for this subject (14)
avatar-seller
maddi2921
EASEMENT 3 – DISQUALIFYING FACTORS
POSSESION, PAYMENT, PERMISSION

1. MUST NOT AMOUNT TO EXCLUSIVE POSSESSION
o In essence limited rights
o It is an INTEREST not an estate in land – dominant owner’s right must not
be too intense.
o Where owner cannot use serviant land AT ALL – clearly easement claim will
fail.
▪ TWO TESTS:
▪ 1. Batchelor v Marlow test – the OUSTER principle
▪ ‘Left with no reasonable use of the land’ (parking 6 cars weekdays
8.30 -6pm)
▪ 2. Moncrieff v Jamieson Test – Possession and control
▪ More flexible test – rejected reasonable use test and and applied
the possession and control test – if possession and control still with
owner then easement is ok.
- Should still use reasonable use test – is binding, but law is changing slightlt
favour easements.

2. ADDITIONAL EXPENDITURE
▪ A positive obligation is inconsistent with the concept of an easement.
▪ Not required for servient owner to carry out maintenance or repairs to
allow easement to be used.
▪ BUT must allow dominant owner onto land to do it themselves, at their
own expense (Jones v Pritchard)
▪ Hot water supply = spending money = no easement. (Regis Property v
Redman)
▪ Rance v Elvin = answer was water can flow through but dominant owner
must pay bill. (in quasi contract)

3. NO PERMISSION
▪ Express permission almost inevitably given when right is first used.
▪ However, afterwards, dominant owner must exercise it as of right
▪ Enjoying benefit as a right is essence of easement
▪ If dominant owner asks for permission every time it can’t be an easement.
▪ Green v Ashco Horticultural – always moved van if asked to – not
easement.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller maddi2921. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £2.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

78252 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now

Start selling
£2.99
  • (0)
  Add to cart