100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
Previously searched by you
OCR A Level History A (2015): Changing Nature of Warfare - Sample Essay Plan: Assess the view that conscription was the most significant development in the conduct of warfare in the period ?£2.99
OCR A Level History A (2015): Changing Nature of Warfare - Sample Essay Plan: Assess the view that conscription was the most significant development in the conduct of warfare in the period ?
Assess the view that conscription was the most significant development in the conduct of warfare in
the period 1792-1945?
Conduct of warfare = strategy and tactics used by generals
Conscription – Certainly a significant development, as lower quality but mass armies determined the tactical
conduct of warfare
● Eg. full frontal assaults with mass conscript armies seen throughout the period
○ Somme and Passchendaele - WW1
○ Siege of Port Arthur - Russo-Japanese War
○ Battle of Fleurus 1794 – French Revolutionary Wars
● Striking impact of conscription seen when comparing Napoleon’s tactics in 1805 vs. 1812
○ Veterans of FRWs made up the bulk of his army in 1805 , allowing Napoleon to use complex
manoeuvre eg. as seen at Austerlitz
○ However by 1812, the bulk of the Grande Armée were poorly trained Eastern European
conscripts → meant that Napoleon was forced to use only basic attrition tactics at Borodino
● WW2 – consideration of conscription also had a key impact in determining tactics
○ Rapid and motorised Blitzkrieg campaigns were intended to produce fast results to avoid a war
of attrition due to fears regarding the quality of mass conscripted troops.
Conscription – Likewise, conscription had a decisive impact strategic use of mass armies
● Attritional strategy was possible as mass armies could sustain huge losses
○ French Revolutionary Wars - 800,000 men raised through conscription
■ Meant that 20% losses per battle were sustainable, and France was able to wage as
many as 10 multple campaigns at once
○ Identical impact seen at the end of the period in WW2 – Attritional strategy used by Russian
High Command 1942-43
■ USSR 16 million-strong conscript army sustained just under 5 million casualties during
Operation Barbarossa
● Conscription of workers was also instrumental as it facilitated the supplying of mass conscript armies
○ Eg. 80,000 Land Girls and 48,000 Bevin Boys were conscripted in Britain in WW2 to supply
mass armes
○ Likewise conscription of 250,000 factory workers during Levée en Masse allowed the French
armies to be properly supplied
■ (eg. one factory in Paris produced 700 muskets daily)
However I would argue that Industrialisation was more important in determining the conduct of wars
● Industrialisation on weaponry
○ Development of machine gun and accurate rifles determined battlefield conduct
■ Whilst in FRWs full frontal assaults were effective against lines of defenders using
unaimed volley fire, as seen at Jena 1806
■ by WWI the strength of defensive weaponry such as the Lewis machine gun (effective
firing range of 800m and 600 rpm) resulted in a 3 year stalemate on the Western front,
as it nullified the effectiveness of frontal assaults by mass conscript armies
● eg. at the Somme 1916).
● Industrialisation on transport
○ Eg. development of railways had a decisive strategic impact
■ Franco-Austrian War 1859 - Transportation of 120,000 rested French troops in 2
weeks by rail to Northern Italy (a journey that previously took 2 months by foot) allowed
them to defeat 400,000 strong Austrian conscript army at Magenta and Solferino
(1859), who were exhausted and dispirited after a 150km march in wet conditions.
■ Similarly 1864 Sherman's March to the Sea - the 60,000 strong conscript army could
not have undertaken such a campaign were it not for the 400 mile long Chattanooga
railway, which effectively supplied them with 36,800 wagons worth of food and
materials.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller robmaclennan15. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for £2.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.