Lecture notes
SEMESTER TWO NOTES PUBLIC LAW
- Module
- Public Law (LAW4001)
- Institution
- Queen Mary, University Of London (QMUL)
Semester 2 notes public law.
[Show more]
Seller
Follow
Content preview
SEMESTER TWOJUDICIAL APPOINTMENTS
- Lord Atkin famously said that the judges were becoming ‘more executively minded than
the executive’
- Pre-CRA 2005:
- Lord Chancellor played central role in appointments
- COA and above → recommendation of PM to Monarch acting on the advice of
the Lord Chancellor
- High Court and Below → recommendation of Lord Chancellor directly to
Monarch/directly by the Lord Chancellor
- Most Public Law cases are against the government, and the Lord Chancellor has played
a crucial role in the appointment of all these important judges
- Three main arguments for changing this system:
- Judicial independence → crucial to separation of powers and the rule of law
- Transparency → those already on the bench would promote those who they
already knew, which meant there was no transparency, BUT now there is more
as vacancies for judges are advertised
- Lack of diversity → most judges are old white men
- Trickle up thesis (this never happened) - judges are still not very diverse
at all
- Case for judicial diversity
- Advisory Panel on Judicial Diversity:
- Equality of opportunity
- Judiciary should reflect the diversity of society
- Wide range of backgrounds and life experiences
- Visible reflection of society will mean more public confidence
- Judges in Favour of Diversity:
- Bertha Wilson (first SC Justice in Canada):
- Told to ‘go home and take up crochet’ when applying to law school
- Male judges tend to adhere to original beliefs about men and women, so
female judges and lawyers can bring new opinions to the table and make
a difference in the decision making process
- Sonia Sotomayor <333:
- Disputed the idea that a wise man and a wise woman would reach the
same decision
- Experiences and background will influence the way in which the judge
rules
- David Lammy MP:
- Better judgements when you move beyond a monocultural judiciary
- Baroness Brenda Hale <3333:
- First female justice in the UKSC
, - Gave judgement in Miller/Cherry
- Ketanji Brown Jackson US SC <33:
- First black female justice in the Supreme Court (we have no black justices
in the Supreme Court in the UK - neither male or female)
- Attacked for defending terror suspects in Guantanamo Bay during her
hearing
- Options for Change:
- Elected judges → causes problems as it means the judgements will be decided
by the electorate as opposed to the judge - aka in Texas a judge MUST run on a
political platform
- Parliamentary approval of executive nominee (federal level in the US) → also
problematic as gets political again
- Judicial appointments commission like in Canada and South Africa
- CRA 2005, Changes:
- Creates a Judicial Appointment Commission for selecting appointments to courts
of England and Wales (NOT UKSC)
- Composition: lay chair, 5 judicial, 5 lay, 2 lawyers, 1 tribunal, 1 magistrate
- Senior Appointments by JAC appointed selection panel (4 members: 2 lay, 2
judicial) (lord chancellor is consulted for this)
- Options of the Lord Chancellor following selection:
- Accept
- Reject or ask for reconsideration, but there must be written reasons and
they can only do this twice
- S63 (merit and good character)
- S64 (encouragement of diversity)
- Not much has happened since 2005 essentially
- Crime and Courts Act 2013:
- UKSC appointments
- Diversity tie-break
- Flexible working
- Encouraging diversity applies to LC and LCJ
- LC power transfer to LCJ/Senior President Tribunals for appointments below the
High Court
JUDICIAL APPOINTMENT TO THE UKSC:
- Until 1399 both Houses of Parliament heard petitions to reverse lower court judgements
- In 1399 → HoC stopped hearing petitions
- 1844: a convention was developed so that lay people could no longer vote (after a case
in which non qualified people disagreed with the qualified law lords)
- 1876: appellate jurisdiction act and then in 1948 the appellate committee was
established (first example of physical separation) → law lords moved their decisions to a
separate room for the first time
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller mariamkorsell. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for £3.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
53068 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now