A complete summary of all chapter handouts, lecture recordings and SGSs consolidated into clear and concise notes with worked examples. Contains everything you need to know for the Challenging Past Transactions and Insolvency sections of the BPP BLP exam.
Insolvency Act 1986 - Prevents reckless and negligent conduct where directors continue to incur debts where
there is no prospect of saving the company thereby increasing creditors’ losses.
FRAUDULENT TRADING
Claimant
S.213 – Liquidator or S.246ZA – Administrator
Third party assignee (raise funds and avoid risk of litigation).
Defendant
S.213(2) and S.246ZA(2): Any person knowingly party to the carrying on of any business of the company.
S.213(1) and S.246ZA(1): With intent to defraud creditors or for any fraudulent purpose.
Requirements
Actual dishonesty must be proved, very high standard so claims are rare.
Defence
Dishonesty assessed on subjective basis, so if genuinely believe, however unrealistically, that ‘things
would get better’ so continue trading then can use this ‘sunshine defence’.
Sanction
S.213 and S.246ZA: Civil liability to contribute to funds available to unsecured creditors for loss caused
by the carrying on of the company’s business with intent to defraud (not punitive).
S.993: Criminal sanctions of imprisonment up to 10 years and fines.
S.10 Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 (CDDA): Disqualification order.
WRONGFUL TRADING
Designed to be easier to prove than fraudulent trading – no requirement for intent or dishonesty. Ensures
directors mitigate losses as will be personally liable.
Claimant
S.214 – Liquidator
S.246ZB – Administrator
Third party assignee (raise funds and avoid risk of litigation).
Defendant
S.214(1) and S.246ZB(1): Any director (shadow, de facto and non-exec) at the relevant time..
Requirements
S.214(2) and S.246ZB(2): At the point of no return (before commencement of winding up / insolvency
procedure) the director knew or ‘ought to have concluded’ there was no reasonable prospect the
company would avoid going into ‘insolvent liquidation or administration’.
o Ought to have concluded –
Accounts show liabilities exceed assets
Litigation against company for unpaid sums
Bank refusing to extend overdraft
Suppliers refusing to make further deliveries until invoices paid
Failure to meet sales or cash flow targets
Collapse of a major customer or supplier
Change in the market
o Insolvent liquidation or administration –
Liabilities and cost of liquidation (S.214(6)) or administration (S.246ZB(6)) exceed assets.
Judged solely on balance sheet test (S.123(2) (not cash flow (S.123(1)(e)).
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller lpc-bpp. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for £3.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
