100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
On Jensen Type Inequalities with Ordered Variables £6.34   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

On Jensen Type Inequalities with Ordered Variables

 0 view  0 purchase

On Jensen Type Inequalities with Ordered Variables

Preview 2 out of 14  pages

  • June 3, 2024
  • 14
  • 2023/2024
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
All documents for this subject (99)
avatar-seller
modockochieng06
Volume 9 (2008), Issue 1, Article 19, 14 pp.


ON JENSEN TYPE INEQUALITIES WITH ORDERED VARIABLES
VASILE CÎRTOAJE
D EPARTMENT OF AUTOMATION AND C OMPUTERS
U NIVERSITY OF P LOIE ŞTI
B UCURE ŞTI 39, ROMANIA
vcirtoaje@upg-ploiesti.ro

Received 15 October, 2007; accepted 05 January, 2008
Communicated by J.E. Pecarić



A BSTRACT. In this paper, we present some basic results concerning an extension of Jensen
type inequalities with ordered variables to functions with inflection points, and then give several
relevant applications of these results.

Key words and phrases: Convex function, k-arithmetic ordered variables, k-geometric ordered variables, Jensen’s inequality,
Karamata’s inequality.
2000 Mathematics Subject Classification. 26D10, 26D20.



1. BASIC R ESULTS
An n-tuple of real numbers X = (x1 , x2 , . . . , xn ) is said to be increasingly ordered if x1 ≤
x2 ≤ · · · ≤ xn . If x1 ≥ x2 ≥ · · · ≥ xn , then X is decreasingly ordered.
In addition, a set X = (x1 , x2 , . . . , xn ) with x1 +x2 +···+x
n
n
= s is said to be k-arithmetic
ordered if k of the numbers x1 , x2 , . . . , xn are smaller than or equal to s, and the other n − k
are greater than or equal to s. On the assumption that x1 ≤ x2 ≤ · · · ≤ xn , X is k-arithmetic
ordered if
x1 ≤ · · · ≤ xk ≤ s ≤ xk+1 ≤ · · · ≤ xn .
It is easily seen that
X1 = (s − x1 + xk+1 , s − x2 + xk+2 , . . . , s − xn + xk )
is a k-arithmetic ordered set if X is increasingly ordered, and is an (n − k)-arithmetic ordered
set if X is decreasingly ordered.

Similarly, an n-tuple of positive real numbers A = (a1 , a2 , . . . , an ) with n a1 a2 · · · an = r is
said to be k-geometric ordered if k of the numbers a1 , a2 , . . . , an are smaller than or equal to r,
and the other n − k are greater than or equal to r. Notice that
 
ak+1 ak+2 ak
A1 = , ,...,
a1 a2 an
is a k-geometric ordered set if A is increasingly ordered, and is an (n − k)-geometric ordered
set if A is decreasingly ordered.
316-07

, 2 VASILE C ÎRTOAJE




Theorem 1.1. Let n ≥ 2 and 1 ≤ k ≤ n − 1 be natural numbers, and let f (u) be a function on
a real interval I, which is convex for u ≥ s, s ∈ I, and satisfies
f (x) + kf (y) ≥ (1 + k)f (s)
for any x, y ∈ I such that x ≤ y and x + ky = (1 + k)s. If x1 , x2 , . . . , xn ∈ I such that
x1 + x2 + · · · + xn
=S≥s
n
and at least n − k of x1 , x2 , . . . , xn are smaller than or equal to S, then
f (x1 ) + f (x2 ) + · · · + f (xn ) ≥ nf (S).
Proof. We will consider two cases: S = s and S > s.
A. Case S = s. Without loss of generality, assume that x1 ≤ x2 ≤ · · · ≤ xn . Since x1 + x2 +
· · · + xn = ns, and at least n − k of the numbers x1 , x2 , . . . , xn are smaller than or equal to s,
there exists an integer n − k ≤ i ≤ n − 1 such that (x1 , x2 , . . . , xn ) is an i-arithmetic ordered
set, i.e.
x1 ≤ · · · ≤ xi ≤ s ≤ xi+1 ≤ · · · ≤ xn .
By Jensen’s inequality for convex functions,
f (xi+1 ) + f (xi+2 ) + · · · + f (xn ) ≥ (n − i)f (z),
where
xi+1 + xi+2 + · · · + xn
z= , z ≥ s, z ∈ I.
n−i
Thus, it suffices to prove that
f (x1 ) + · · · + f (xi ) + (n − i)f (z) ≥ nf (s).
Let y1 , y2 , . . . , yi ∈ I be defined by
x1 + ky1 = (1 + k)s, x2 + ky2 = (1 + k)s, . . . , xi + kyi = (1 + k)s.
We will show that z ≥ y1 ≥ y2 ≥ · · · ≥ yi ≥ s. Indeed, we have
y1 ≥ y2 ≥ · · · ≥ yi ,
s − xi
yi − s = ≥ 0,
k
and
ky1 = (1 + k)s − x1
= (1 + k − n)s + x2 + · · · + xn
≤ (k + i − n)s + xi+1 + · · · + xn
= (k + i − n)s + (n − i)z ≤ kz.
Since z ≥ y1 ≥ y2 ≥ · · · ≥ yi ≥ s implies y1 , y2 , . . . , yi ∈ I, by hypothesis we have
f (x1 ) + kf (y1 ) ≥ (1 + k)f (s),
f (x2 ) + kf (y2 ) ≥ (1 + k)f (s),
.........
f (xi ) + kf (yi ) ≥ (1 + k)f (s).
Adding all these inequalities, we get
f (x1 ) + f (x2 ) + · · · + f (xi ) + k[f (y1 ) + f (y2 ) + · · · + f (yi )] ≥ i(1 + k)f (s).


J. Inequal. Pure and Appl. Math., 9(1) (2008), Art. 19, 14 pp. http://jipam.vu.edu.au/

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller modockochieng06. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £6.34. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

79978 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now

Start selling
£6.34
  • (0)
  Add to cart