100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary Vicarious Liability £4.76   Add to cart

Summary

Summary Vicarious Liability

 10 views  0 purchase

Includes: - Vicarious Liability

Preview 1 out of 1  pages

  • June 6, 2024
  • 1
  • 2023/2024
  • Summary
All documents for this subject (57)
avatar-seller
finn8
A 3rd party has legal responsibility for the actions of
another.

Vicarious Liability Commonly seen when an employer is liable for a tort
committed by an employee.

Deeper Pockets.
Was a Tort committed?
In Barclays Bank v VC Lady Hale
3 Q’s asked whether the tortfeasor was
Was the Tortfeasor an in a relationship akin to
employee? Testing employment:

whether an 1) Control test – If the employer
had the right to control what the
Was the Tortfeasor in the employee employee did and the way it was
course of employment? done (Mersey Docks v Coggins)

2) Integration test – How
integrated an employee’s work was
and if it was just work accessory to
business (Stevenson Jordan and
Employer usually liable for: Harrison v McDonalds and Evans)
Wrongful acts authorised by
3) Economic Reality / Multiples test
employer, and
– Looks at multiple factors such as
Salmond Test ownership of equipment, tax and
Acts which are wrong ways flexibility / autonomy (Ready Mix
of doing something Concrete v Minister of Pensions)
authorised by employer. 4) Mutuality of Obligations – was
If Doubt there an obligation for employer to
provide work and an obligation for
the tortfeasor to accept that work?

What function or field of
activities has been entrusted to Lady Hale in Barclays Bank v Various
the employee by the employer? Claimants “Where it is clear that the
Close Connection Test tortfeasor is carrying on his own
(Mohamud v Morrison independent business it is not necessary
to consider the five incidents”
Supermarkets)
Was there a sufficient connection between
the position the employee was employed
and the wrongful conduct? (Morrison
Supermarkets v VC [Personal motive means
close connection cannot be established]).




Deduction of Wages:
If not in course of employment,
then employee is on a ‘frolic of - Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978
their own’ (Parke, B in Joel v Employer can recover any moneys by a
Morison) deduction in wages

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller finn8. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £4.76. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

78834 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now

Start selling
£4.76
  • (0)
  Add to cart