100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary Private Nuisance £4.76   Add to cart

Summary

Summary Private Nuisance

 10 views  0 purchase

Includes: - Private Nuisance

Preview 1 out of 1  pages

  • June 6, 2024
  • 1
  • 2023/2024
  • Summary
All documents for this subject (57)
avatar-seller
finn8
Defences:-
Unlawful
Nuisance(private)
1. Ordinary use of land (Southwark LBC v Mills)


Interferences (St - Claimant must have an interest in the land
2. Statutory Authority (Allen v Gulf Oil Refining Ltd)

3. Act of God (Nicholls v Marsland, Goldman v

Helens Smelting -
(Hunter v Canary Wharf)
Defendant just needs to have just used land not
Hargrave [aware and fails])

4. Prescription (Coventry v Lawrence [C aware of
be the occupier (Jones Ltd v Portsmouth City
Co v Tipping) : Council)
nuisance for 20 yrs ])

Public Policy (Dennis v MOD [Only used to not put an
Use or enjoyment of land interfered with injunction but instead award compensatory damages])
(Southwark LBC v Mills)




1. Locality 2. Frequency of activity 3. Sensitivity 4. Intensity of 5. Malice
Flooding (Sedleigh-Denfield v O’Callagham) activity
Industrial vs Residential Temporary activity may If C is abnormally If D’s actions are
Smells (Wheeler v JJ Saunders) (Hirose Electrical v Peak still constitute a sensitive, D not liable. Must be more malicious, more likely
Ingredients) nuisance (De Keysor’s than ‘dainty to be unreasonable.
Encroachment (Lemmon v Webb) If C’s use of land is
Royal Hotel v Spicer modes or habits’ (Hollywood Silver Fox
Planning permission can abnormally sensitive, D
Noise (Kennaway v Thompson) Bros) (Walter v Selfe) Farm v Emmett)
change nature of locality not liable. (McKinnon
Cricket Balls (Miller v Jackson) (Coventry v Lawrence) Industries v Walker)
Brothel (Thompson-Schwab v Costaki) 6. Time of day /
timing of activity




Remedies: Foreseeability

- Damages; Leads to loss of amenity or physical damage Damage must not be too remote.
(Cambridge Waters v Eastern Counties
- Injunctions.
Leather, Wagon Mound No.1)

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller finn8. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £4.76. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

78834 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now

Start selling
£4.76
  • (0)
  Add to cart