Comprehensive textbook, lecture and academic notes on Topics in English Land Law.
Includes key cases, analysis of the law, academic criticism and my own comments. Got me a 1st
ADVERSE POSSESSION
Introduction
Adverse possession allows a person who occupies land without permission to become the owner
without paying compensation to the original proprietor. This may sometimes be the outcome of
organised squatting (Ellis v Lambeth LBC).
Policy rationales for allowing adverse possession:
1. Establishing who owns the land, thereby facilitating conveyancing (particularly useful for
unregistered land, since root of title can become lost)
2. Ensuring legal entitlement is in line with factual reality
3. Encouraging more effective land use (use it or lose it – land is a finite resource; 600,000 empty
properties in the UK currently)
4. Labour-desert theory (less convincing; idea that by maintaining land, entitled to it)
5. Respecting psychological connection with the land
To balance interests, LRA 2002 limits AP to three cases: where O fails to assert rights when prompted,
where S reasonably believes adjoining land is his, or where S can claim the land by other grounds
Structure of adverse possession:
S enters AP immediate legal consequences legal effects of the running of time (UR + R)
Immediate Legal Consequences (Possession and Relativity of Title)
If you adversely possess land, this generates a freehold estate (fee simple) from the moment of
possession (a form of original acquisition of title)
- Turner v Chief Land Registrar
Implications of title:
1. Exclusion – S is able to exclude others from the land and can bring actions against trespass
- Armory v Delamirie (1722) (appraisal of jewel) (personal property law)
2. Transferability – if S were able to find someone interested, he could sell, lease, or gift his title
(though this is unlikely because of relativity of title)
3. Perry v Clissold – rights before completion may secure other benefits (eg right to compensation
on compulsory purchase)
S’ title will be inferior to the owner’s title because of relativity of title. Both O and S have fee simples in
law, but because O’s title comes first in time, it is given priority. If S2 dispossesses S, S’ title will take
priority over S2’s FS, and O’s title will take priority over both. O can bring a legal claim to evict S from the
moment S goes into possession.
- Asher v Whitlock (1865) (“possession is good title against all but the true owner”)
S as a tenant
When S is a tenant, there is a presumption that S is adversely possessing on behalf of the landlord, as
long as the relevant land is physically near the tenanted property. This means L gets the fee simple, not
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller edwardasmith. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for £4.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
