100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
'To what extent was the split of the Social Democrats due to Lenin?' £3.49   Add to cart

Essay

'To what extent was the split of the Social Democrats due to Lenin?'

 51 views  0 purchase

A Level Pearson/Edexcel History Paper 2 Section B essay, achieved a high level 5 (18/20) and written by a student predicted an A*

Preview 1 out of 2  pages

  • June 23, 2019
  • 2
  • 2018/2019
  • Essay
  • Unknown
  • A*
book image

Book Title:

Author(s):

  • Edition:
  • ISBN:
  • Edition:
All documents for this subject (15)
avatar-seller
nmt2304
‘To what extent was the split of the Social Democrats due to Lenin?’ [20 marks]

The Social Democrats separated into the Bolshevik and Menshevik parties in 1903,
led by Lenin and Martov respectively. The two groups developed contrasting
ideologies, plans for pursuing power and interpretations of Marxism. While Lenin’s
role in the divide was clearly significant, he may not be entirely responsible for the
split of the Social Democrats.

On one hand, Lenin was responsible for the split of the Social Democrats, because he
chose to break away from traditional Marxist ideas at the risk of creating divisions
within the party. For example, Lenin’s ideas, such as prioritising practical, violent
revolution, contradicted the original Marxist theories, which stated that the
development of a proletariat was required before the bourgeoisie could be tackled.
However, conditions in Russia differed significantly from those Marx deemed
suitable for a revolution, especially given that Russia had a very small urban
proletariat, and therefore Lenin adapted the Marxist theology. This suggests that
Lenin was responsible for the split of the Social Democrats, because he provoked
divisions within the party by publishing controversial ideas regarding the party’s
interpretation of Marxism.

However, Lenin may not be entirely responsible for the split of the Social Democrats
was because the two groups could not agree on their interpretation of Marxist
theories in the context of Russia. For example, the Mensheviks believed in stagism,
meaning that Russia could not progress from autocracy to socialism immediately,
and therefore Russia would have to undergo a period of capitalism before it could
advance to socialism. They also supported reformism, which involved creating trade
unions in order to improve the workers’ conditions. However, the Bolsheviks
demanded outright revolution, despite the lack of support for their cause which
would almost definitely result in an unsuccessful attempt at a revolution. This
suggests that Lenin was not entirely responsible for the split of the Social Democrats,
because the party disagreed on how Marxism could be put into practice in Russia,
which would inevitably lead to the creation of two distinct groups.

Another reason why Lenin was responsible for the split of the Social Democrats was
because of his personal disagreements with Plekhanov and Martov. For example,
Lenin initially disagreed with Plekhanov regarding the nature of membership within
the Social Democrat party: Plekhanov wanted an inclusive group open to all potential
revolutionaries, whereas Lenin aimed to establish an exclusive group of
‘professional’ revolutionaries to lead a nationwide uprising. Lenin also became
involved in an internal conflict with Iskra co-editor Martov, who believed Lenin’s
ideas demonstrated his desire to become a dictator. This suggests that Lenin was
responsible for the split of the Social Democrats, because his personal
disagreements with powerful party members created tensions within the party,
resulting in the emergence of two contrasting interpretations of Marxism.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller nmt2304. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £3.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

75057 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now

Start selling
£3.49
  • (0)
  Add to cart