Summary
Summary Christianity and Science revision notes (AQA A level)
- Module
- Christianity and Science
- Institution
- AQA
notes for Christianity and science so you don't have to make them yourself, saves you trouble and time :)
[Show more]
Seller
Follow
Content preview
Background History:● Modern science came about as a result of developments in the 16th-18th centuries
● Earlier scientific thinkers lacked the systematic approaches to evidence that
developed from the sixteenth century and shaped modern science.
● Most of the first ‘modern’ scientists were religious and didn’t see their work as
conflicting with established Christian teachings.
The Rise of Science
● With the rise of science came the assumption that human reason could understand
the way the world works without any divine influence
● This implied: a trust in evidence and experiment as a means of acquiring knowledge
an assumption that the world is orderly and intelligible
a willingness to challenge all claims to truth and therefore to set aside the authority of
the Church
The Autonomy of Human Reason:
● The rise of science led to the perception of human reason as autonomous i.e. free to
follow its own agenda, rather than simply following religious teachings
● This threatened the authority of religion
● Scientists developed a systematic approach to understanding the world, which was
entirely independent of religious ideas
Method of Science
● We trust science because of the methods used (observation, reason, experiment) and
the emphasis on evidence and reason
● Conclusions are repeatedly tested, and independent observers can test them again
● Carl Sagan claimed Science is like democracy – both are transparent: everyone can
look at the data and not be misled
● Empiricism -
- Knowledge is gained through the senses, through evidence which can be
tested.
- All real knowledge of the world is based on sensation.
● Rationalism -
- The mind is the source of knowledge. Truth can be deduced using the powers
of reason
- Sense experience is secondary and is fallible. It can be mistaken.
Descartes on Uncertainty
● Employed systematic doubt.
● He decided to “reject as absolutely false anything which gave rise in my mind to the
slightest doubt”
● He rejected the sense experience as it can be mistaken
, ● How do we know we’re not deceived by an evil demon or we’re not in a dream the
whole time?
The Scientific Method
● “It is not what the man of science believes that distinguishes him, but how and why
he believes it. His beliefs are tentative, not dogmatic; they are based on evidence,
not on authority or intuition.” (Bertrand Russell)
● There are two fundamentally different processes involved in gaining knowledge:
deduction and induction
The Deductive Approach
● If one proposition is true, others may be deduced from it. That works well, provided
the first proposition is correct
● So, for example, the medieval view of the heavens was that they were perfect, and
the circle was a perfect shape; therefore, the planets had to move in circles.
The Inductive Approach
● The inductive method depends on observation and testing and was the key feature of
the development of science.
● Scientists:
- observe and gather evidence
- analyse the evidence, and draw conclusions (hypothesis)
- devise experiments to test out the hypothesis
- modify the hypothesis, if necessary argue for a theory that will explain the
evidence and results
- once there is a theory, use deduction to predict things that should be the case
if the theory is correct
- establish tests that can either verify or disprove the theory
● It is sometimes assumed that science delivers certainty, but the inductive process
can only give a high degree of probability
● Science is naturalistic (deals with the natural world as it is experienced) and therefore
potential conflicts with any supernatural claims of Christianity.
Strengths of the scientific approach:
+ Science is always open to challenges and willing to reject previously held beliefs
+ Religion is often accused of the opposite.
+ Parable of the Gardner - the perceived differences between statements based on faith
and statements based on scientific evidence, and the problems associated with
unfalsifiable beliefs (beliefs not capable of being false)
+ Science is based on inductive reasoning. There is always the possibility the
conclusions are wrong, but this is a healthy part of the process.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller ojasbinilohani. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for £5.36. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
75632 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now