100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
8 Essay Questions Plans for OCR Philosophy £9.66   Add to cart

Essay

8 Essay Questions Plans for OCR Philosophy

 11 views  0 purchase

8 Essay Questions Plans for OCR Philosophy

Preview 1 out of 15  pages

  • June 26, 2024
  • 15
  • 2022/2023
  • Essay
  • Unknown
  • A
  • eval
All documents for this subject (136)
avatar-seller
daisy2147
"The logical fallacies in Aquinas' first three ways cannot be overcome." Discuss.
(Do the weaknesses outweigh the strengths)

Intro
- Fallacy: unsound belief using inconvenience logic
- Cosmological argument: argument to prove the existence through God through
the empiricist view that God causes everything.
- Unmoved mover, unpaused cause and contingency/necessary are all fallacies

Line of argument: Aquinas’ arguments are inherently flawed and cannot be successfully
defended

Point 1: the fallacy of composition overcomes Aquinas first and second way

Explain
The 1st way asserts how the chain of motion is moved by something else
This movement cannot have gone infinitely into the past
Their must be an unmoved mover of the universe - God

The 2nd way asserts how everything is caused in the universe as nothing could not exist
This cause could not go on infinitely
There must be an uncaused causer of the universe - God.

However,
Hume detailed the absurdity of these fallacies as he described how just because things in
the universe is caused, this gives us no reason to assume that the universe as a whole is
caused. This fallacy of composition is illustrates in Hume’s example: if you find an
explanation for each particle, it would be wrong to seek an explanation for the whole
matter.

Russel would also agree: every man has a mother is no proof that the collective human race
has a mother.

Analysis
This is an influential viewpoint as it is certain that we have not witnessed the cause of the
universe, therefore we cannot state it is specifically caused.

Furthermore we do not need/desire an explanation for the whole universe if we can see and
understand causation in the universe. E.g. we observe water causing flowers to grow.

Therefore we should not apply this knowledge to I the universe. (Phillips: it is beyond our
understanding)

Counter:
However, the fallacy of composition fails as this limits God and his omnipotence.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller daisy2147. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £9.66. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

72042 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now

Start selling
£9.66
  • (0)
  Add to cart