Summary
Summary UK politics paper 1: 3.3 electoral system analysis
- Module
- UK Politics paper 1
- Institution
- PEARSON (PEARSON)
detailed study/revision notes on thsi area of the specification for a level politics edexcel.
[Show more]
Seller
Follow
Content preview
3.3 electoral system analysis –Impact of UK electoral systems –
Impact on govts & type of govt –
Proportional systems – led to more coalition or minority govts formed when used.
(NI because of Good Friday Agreement so exception).
Scotland & Wales have had coalitions, but also achieved majority govts using
proportional system.
Given that AMS created a strong, single-party govt – fuelled discussions over
whether systems like AMS could replace FPTP.
- Wales & Scotland legislate successfully over their own regions – both pressed for
further power to be devolved to them (as seen in subsequent Scotland and Wales
Acts).
- For Wales – gaining primary legislative powers & changing from ‘conferred matters’
model (make law only on policy areas it had been given) to ‘reserved matters’ model
(has been used in Scotland & allowed it to make laws on anything not ‘reserved’ for
westminster parliament).
- For Scotland – pressure for independence & referendum. Outcome initially quelled
this pressure BUT Brexit referendum result (Scotland as a nation voted ‘remain’)
reignited issue of Scottish independence.
Govts created proven to be stable.
NI exception – issues less to do with electoral system & more to do with historical
tensions.
Impact on parties & party systems –
Number of parties successfully competing in elections & forming govts increased
because of proportional systems.
In Wales, Scotland & NI, nationalist or unionist parties (SNP, Plaid Cymru, DUP, Sinn
Fein) have gained influence & been able to be part of govts in their countries /
provinces.
Systems also allowed success for other parties –
- Conservatives performed poorly in Scotland since Thatcher.
- Under AMS, they have been able to pick up seats – 2nd largest party in Scottish
parliament.
- AMS allowed conservatives’ widely spread support to be translated into seats at
regional level.
- (though still perform less well at constituency level in Scotland).
Some devolved bodies – arguably smaller parties over-represented.
- 2007 – SNP won 47 seats 7 Labour won 46. SNP agreement with Greens (2 seats)
allowed SNP to form minority govt.
- Small parties – ‘king-makers’ – like role of Lib Dems in 2010 – exercise power far
beyond that which their electoral success suggests.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller zahrayousaf. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for £4.96. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
52510 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now