Exam (elaborations)
CBP Entrance Exam Study Guide/22 Questions with Answers 2024
CBP Entrance Exam Study Guide/22 Questions with Answers 2024
[Show more]
Content preview
CBP Entrance Exam Study Guide/22 Questionswith Answers 2024
Some 480,000 immigrants were living in a certain country in 1999. Although
most of these immigrants were not employed in professional occupations,
many of them were. For instance, many of them were engineers and many of
them were nurses. Very few of these immigrants were librarians, another
professional occupation.
From the information given above, it can validly concluded that, in 1999, in
the country described above:
A) Most immigrants were either engineers or nurses
B) It is not the case that some of the nurses were immigrants
C) None of the engineers were immigrants
D) Some of the engineers were immigrants - -D) Some of the engineers were
immigrants
-A trucking company can act as a 'common carrier' - for hire to the general
public at published rates. As a common carrier, the trucking company is
liable for any cargo damage, unless the company can show that it was not
negligent. If the company can demonstrate that it was not negligent, then it
is not liable for cargo damage. In contrast, a 'contract carrier' ( a trucking
company hired by a shipper under a specific contract) is only responsible for
cargo damage spelled out in the contract. A Claus Inc. tractor-trailer, acting
under common carrier authority, was in a 5-vehivle accident that damaged
its cargo. A Nichlos Inc. tractor-trailer, acting under contract carrier
authority, was involved in the same accident, and its cargo was also
damaged.
From the information given above, it can be validly concluded that, in
reference to the accident:
A) If Claus Inc. is liable, then it can show that it was not negligent - -C) If
Claus Inc. can show that it was not negligent, then it is not liable
-A rapidly changing technical environment in government is promoting
greater reliance on electronic mail (e-mail) systems. As this usage grows,
there are increasing chances of conflict between the users' expectations of
privacy and public access rights. In some investigation, access to ALL e-mail,
including those messages stored in archival files and messages outside the
scope of the investigation, has been sought and granted. In spite of this,
, some people send messages through e-mail that would never be said face-
to-face or written formally.
From the information given above, it CANNOT be validly concluded that:
A) Some e-mails messages that have been requested as part of
investigations have contained messages that would neve be said face-to-
face
B) Some messages that people would never say face-to-face are sent in e-
mail messages
C) Some e-mail messages have been requested as part of investigations
D) E-mail m - -A) Some e-mails messages that have been requested as part
of investigations have contained messages that would neve be said face-to-
face
-Often, crimes are characterized as either "malum in se"-inherently evil-or
"malum prohibitum"-criminal because they are declared as offenses by a
legislature. Murder is an example of the former. Failing to file a tax return
illustrates the later. Some jurisdictions no longer distinguish between crimes
"malum in se" and "malum prohibitum", although many still do.
From the information given above, it can be validly concluded that:
A) Many jurisdictions no longer distinguish between crimes "malum in se"
and "malum prohibitum"
B) Some jurisdictions still distinguish between crimes "malum in se" and
"malum prohibitum"
C) Some crimes characterized as "malum in se" are not inherently evil
D) Some crimes characterized as "malum prohibitum" are not declared by a
legislature to be an offense
E) Sometimes failing to file a tax return is characterized as 'malum in se' - -
B) Some jurisdictions still distinguish between crimes "malum in se" and
"malum prohibitum"
-Phyllis T. is a former Federal employee who was entitled to benefits under
the Federal Employee
Compensation Act because of a job-related, disabling injury. When an eligible
Federal employee has such an injury, the benefit is determined by this test:
If the beneficiary is married or has dependents, benefits are 3/4 of the
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Victorious23. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for £8.36. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
80461 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now