100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
FEM11118 summary week 1-4 £2.57   Add to cart

Summary

FEM11118 summary week 1-4

1 review
 61 views  0 purchase
  • Module
  • Institution

Have a look at the bundle, everything included for 6 euro. I got a 9,3

Preview 3 out of 26  pages

  • September 5, 2019
  • 26
  • 2018/2019
  • Summary

1  review

review-writer-avatar

By: ggoutoftouch • 5 year ago

avatar-seller
Advanced Corporate Finance and Governance Summary

Week 1, no class

Week 2 slides

 Why do we care about capital structure?
o People with money and people with ideas are not the same people, interests are not aligned
 Optimize capital structure to reduce the weighted average cost of capital
o If no taxes
r e∗E r d∗D
 WACC = +
D+ E D+ E
o Interest rate on debt usually lower than the required
return on shares
 When there is more debt in a firm, it is riskier for equity holders,
so they demand a higher return
 Share= part of ownership
 The value of the firm is the discounted value of the future
cashflows
o The capital structure has a direct influence on the
discount factor, so the present value of the future
cashflows
 Modigliani & Miller state that the capital structure of a firm is not relevant
o The Pie-theory
 You cannot change the size of a pie by cutting it into different sized slices
 M&M Proposition 1
o The value of an asset remains the same, regardless of how the net operating cash flows
generated by the asset are divided between different classes of investors
 Pie theory
 Cash flows matter, but how you divide the cash flows doesn’t matter
 M&M Proposition 2
o The cost of equity of a levered firm is equal to the cost of an unlevered firm plus a financial
risk premium, which depends on the degree of financial leverage
 In a formula
D
 r e =r 0+ (r −r )
E 0 d
 The more debt there is, the more return the equity holders will demand
o The more debt there is, the higher Re becomes
 Interest rate on debt generally lower than required return on shares
 The firm value of a levered firm should have the same firm value as an unlevered firm
o Firm value levered and unlevered should be the same
 Key assumptions by M&M
o Individuals borrow at the same rate as corporations
o Perfect capital market (no information asymmetry or transaction costs)
o No taxes
o No costs for financial distress
o Fixed investment policy
 Personal taxes matter as well, since this determines how easily the firm can raise money through debt
or equity financers
 Classical system
o Leverage will increase a firm’s value because interest on debt is a tax deductible expense
resulting in an increase in the after-tax net cash flows to investors
 Proposition 1, with taxes
o Value of a levered firm is equal to the value of an unlevered firm of the same risk class plus
the present value of the tax saving


1

,  Debt seems to be the best choice for the financing of a firm, why use equity?
o The main benefit of increased debt is the increased benefit from the interest expense as it
reduces taxable income
o With an increased debt load, the following occurs:
 Interest expense rises and the cash flow that needs to cover the interest expense
also rise
 Debt issuers become nervous that the company will not be able to cover its financial
responsibilities with respect to the debt they are issuing
 Stock holders become nervous too
 If interest increases, EPS decreases, and a lower stock price is valued.
 If a company goes bankrupt, stockholders are the last to be paid retribution
o Overall, tax gives an advantage to debt, the personal tax rate reduces this advantage a little
 Why not 100% debt financing for firms?
o This decreases the company’s rating, increases chances for bankruptcy
o Smaller chance to pay all the interest every year
 In M&M going bankrupt was costless, unlike in the real world
o Direct costs: lawyers, accountants
o Indirect costs, are more important: even before going bankrupt, rumours for example, could
already hurt a lot  suppliers are scared, employees might leave
 Costs for financial distress
o Are the highest for the banking industry, bank run
o Are not easy to measure
o The average costs are about 10-20% of the firm value
 Bankruptcy provides a good reason to not having too much debt
 The reasons described above are an answer to the assumptions of M&M, so
o Individuals don’t borrow at the same rate as corporations (personal tax vs. corporate tax)
o There are transaction costs
o There are taxes, even double taxation  shareholders pay tax through the corporate tax,
and have to pay tax on the dividends themselves
o Costs of financial distress are really high in the real world
o Do firms have investment policies independent of leverage?
 Agency costs
 Risk shifting (disadvantage of debt)
o Which is also known as asset substitution, occurs if managers
make overly risky investment decisions that maximize shareholder
value at the expense of debtholders' interests. A stockholder's
claim on a levered company can be viewed as a call option on the
group's asset value.
 Risky projects are started by equity holders, when there
are substantial amounts of debt, and equity holders start
gambling on really risky decisions, just to get every
money out of the firm. Bondholders know this will
happen, so they demand a higher return
 Shareholders have more upside potential
 Bondholders have more downside risk
o Asset substitution and risk shifting is especially relevant if the risk
of default is substantial
 Over-investment (empire building) (advantage of debt)
o A conflict of interest between shareholders and managers
 When there is just too much money lying around, so
managers overinvest, and just use it for personal use,
such as private planes, which is not in line with the
interests of the shareholders  agency cost




2

,  Taking on more debt is a form of discipline with regard to management
o Higher interest payments reduce the free cash flows, so managers can invest less into risky
projects
 Static trade-off theory
o Between tax shields and the costs of financial distress, agency problems
o The static version says, there is an optimal capital structure
o Agency costs are included
 Debt is good, because it reduces overinvestment, but at some point it becomes bad
because you het asset substitution
 There is always an optimum
 Dynamic trade-off theory
o Wherever you are, you try to move to the optimum
 Relation between firm characteristics and optimal debt ratios
o Theoretical predictions Reality
 Firm size + +
 Fixed assets (tangibility) + + Firms with fixed assets use debt financing the most
 Growth opportunities - -
 Profitability + - Profitable firms should have a lot of debt, prediction
 Firm risk - -
 Notes on theoretical predictions
o Profitability
 Firms that are profitable can benefit more from a tax shield since they are paying
more taxes due to their profitability
 Most predictions of the static trade-off theory are consistent with patterns in the data
o However some, like the relation between profitability and leverage, are not
 Findings of Graham (2000)
o A significant number of firms are surprisingly conservative in their use of debt
o Even firms with low expected costs of financial distress (large, profitable firms)
 Static trade-off theory
o The theory is one of the main capital structure theories and poses that firms have a target
debt ratio based on the advantages and disadvantages of debt
 One advantage of debt is the tax treatment of interest (tax shield)
 One disadvantage is the cost of financial distress




 The propositions of M&M
o 1
 The value of an asset remains the same, regardless of how the net operating cash
flows generated by the assets are divided between the different classes of investors
(debt vs equity investors)
o 2
 The cost of equity of a levered firm is equal to the cost of equity of an unlevered
firm plus a financial risk premium, which depends on the degree of financial
leverage

3

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Olivier1992. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £2.57. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

76669 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now

Start selling
£2.57
  • (1)
  Add to cart