100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary Criminal Litigation - Sentencing Principles £8.66   Add to cart

Summary

Summary Criminal Litigation - Sentencing Principles

 6 views  0 purchase

1. purposes of sentencing and sentencing guidelines 2. assessment of seriousness, reduction in sentence for guilty plea, aggravating and mitigating factors, the totality principle and prevalence 3. pre-sentence reports, medical reports, and victim personal statements 4. indications as to senten...

[Show more]

Preview 2 out of 7  pages

  • July 16, 2024
  • 7
  • 2023/2024
  • Summary
All documents for this subject (26)
avatar-seller
pearlagius
Syllabus 22: Sentencing Principles
1) Purposes of sentencing
[E1.2-E1.4]
s.57 Sentencing Act 2020:
(2)The court must have regard to the following purposes of sentencing—
(a)the punishment of offenders,
(b)the reduction of crime (including its reduction by deterrence),
(c)the reform and rehabilitation of offenders,
(d)the protection of the public, and
(e)the making of reparation by offenders to persons affected by their offences.


2) General provisions in sentencing
[E2.1- E2.4, E2.9- E2.12 E2.15, E2.17-2.19 and the first two sub-paragraphs of E13.22]

 Credit for G plea
s.73 Sentencing Act 2020: reduction in sentence for a guilty plea. Benefit of G plea apply regardless
of the strength of the evidence against the offender.
G plea indicated at the first stage of proceedings Maximum Reduction = 1/3 Credit
G plea indicated after the first stage of ¼ Credit
proceedings
G plea indicated on first day of trial 1/10 Credit
G plea entered during course of trial Should normally be decreased even further,
even to 0
G plea at PTPH 1/3 should NOT be given unless D pleaded
guilty in MC or where an IO has been charged,
has provided an unequivocal indication of guilty
at MC
Newton Hearing Reduction may be lost


It is wrong to suspend a prison sentence to reflect a plea of guilty.

 Aggravating factors
Aggravating factors affecting the seriousness of the offence should always be taken into account when
deciding whether an offence is serious enough to warrant a community sentence or so serious that
neither a find alone nor a community sentence can be justified. Lies told by the offender are not
aggravating factors.
s.64 SA 2020: Offence committed on bail
- particularly acute where the offence committed on bail is of the same type as the offence for which
bail was granted.
s.65 SA 2020: Previous convictions

, - Convictions accrued after the instant offence was committed are not pre-cons for the purpose of this
provision.
- Sentence must remain proportionate
s.66 SA 2020: Hostility
- Does not apply where the court is imposing sentence for one of the racially or religiously aggravated
offences under CDA 1998 nor when A is being sentenced to the basic offence where a racially or
religiously aggravated version exists.
- If presence of aggravating factor is disputed by the defence, a newton hearing may well be necessary
to resolve the matter
s.69 SA 2020: Terrorist connection

 Mitigating Factors
s.77 & s.78 SA 2020:
- the weight to be given to mitigation is a matter within the discretion of the court and in particular the
serious nature of the offence may mean that little weight can be given.

 Prevalence
There may be exceptional circumstances that lead a court to decide that local prevalence should
influence sentencing levels, this should be supported by evidence.

 Totality Principle
Two elements:
- Overall sentence should reflect all of the offending behaviour with reference to overall harm
and culpability, together with the aggravating and mitigating factors; and
- Be just and proportionate.


3) Reports
[E2.23, E2.37, E2.30]
s.30 & 31 SA 2020: Pre-sentence report

 Victim Personal Statements
Provide a practical way of ensuring that the court will consider the evidence of the victim about the
personal impact of the offence. It is not an opportunity for the victim to suggest or discuss the type or
level of sentence to be imposed.

 Medical Reports
s.232 SA 2020: in any case where an offender appears to be or is suffering from a mental disorder, the
court must obtain and consider a medical report before passing a custodial sentence other than one
fixed by law (unless unnecessary to do so).
4) Indication on sentence
[D12.60-12.65]

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller pearlagius. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £8.66. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

76462 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now

Start selling
£8.66
  • (0)
  Add to cart