Exam (elaborations)
Nifa Study Guide Complete Solution <<100% Verified
- Module
- Institution
Nifa Study Guide Complete Solution <<100% Verified
[Show more]
Seller
Follow
Mboffin
Reviews received
Content preview
Nifa Study Guide Complete Solution <<100% Verified The nnnumber nnone nnpatient nnsafety nnissue nnidentified nnin nna nnsurvey nnof nnperi-operative nnnurses nnis nnpreventing: nn- nncorrect nnanswer's nnWrong nnsite/procedure/patient nnsurgery Reprocessing nn(flashing) nninstruments nnin nnthe nnOR nnis nnhigh nnrisk nnbecause: nn- nncorrect nnanswer's nnOR nnpersonnel nnnot nnproperly nntrained nnto nnreprocess nninstruments To nnsafely nntransfer nnand nnposition nnpatients nnin nna nnmanner nnthat nnprevents nnshearing, nnpersonnel nnshould nnuse nna nnmechanica l nnlifting nndevice nnfor nna nnsupine -to-supine nntransfer nnof nna nnpatient nnweighing nnmore nnthan: nn- nncorrect nnanswer's nn157 nnlbs _______________ nnshould nnbe nnthe nnprimary nndecision nnmakers nnfor nnwhat nnequipment nnand nnsupplies nnare nnpurchased nnand nnstocked nnin nnthe nndifficult nnairway nnmanagement nncart. nn- nncorrect nnanswer's nnAnesthesia nnpersonnel Proper nnspecimen nnmanagement nntechniques nnprevent nnerrors nnand nninclude nnall nnof nnthe nnfollowing nnEXCEPT: nn- nncorrect nnanswer's nnReceiving nnspecimens nnfrom nnthe nnsurgical nnfield nnthen nnaffixing nnpatient nnlabel nnto nneach Preventing nnsurgical nnfires nnis nna nntop nnpriority nnfor nnall nnOR nnpersonnel nnand nnmembers nnof nnthe nnsurgical nnteam nnshould nnperform nnall nnof nnthe nnfollowing nnduties nnEXCEPT: nn- nncorrect nnanswer's nnPerform nna nnweekly nnfire nnrisk nnassessment Peri-operative nnhypothermia nnis nnan nnimportant nnissue nnfor nnall nnanesth etized nnpatients nnbecause nnof nnall nnof nnthe nnfollowing nnEXCEPT: nn- nncorrect nnanswer's nnIncreases nnrisk nnof nnrenal nnfailure Recommendations nnfor nnpreventing nnretained nnsurgical nnitems nninclude nnall nnof nnthe nnfollowing nnEXCEPT: nn- nncorrect nnanswer's nnUtilizing nna nnmultidisciplinary nnteam nnto nnresolve nnincorrect nncounts Select nnthe nnappropriate nnorder nnfor nnadministering nnblood nnand nnblood nnproducts. nn- nncorrect nnanswer's nnVerify nninformed nnconsent nnfor nnblood, nnverify nnpatient nnidentification nnand nnblood nntype nnand nnunit nnnumbers nnagainst nnblood nntag nnand nnrequisition nnslip nnwith nnsecond nnlicensed nnperson, nnsign nnslips Weighing nnsponges nnis nna nnvaluable nntool nnfor nnmeticulous nncalculation nnof nnblood nnand nnfluid nnloss nnwhen nnconducted nncorrectly nnand nnused nnin nnappropriate nncircumstances. nnSelect nnthe nnresponse nnthat nncorrectly nnreflects nnthe nnbest nnpractice nnin nnweighing nnsponges. nn- nncorrect nnanswer's nnKeep nna nnrunning nntotal nnblood nnloss nncalculated nnfrom nnavailable nnsponges nnduring nnprocedure Laparoscopic nnprocedures nnthat nnemergently nnconvert nnto nnopen nnprocedures nnplace nnthe nnpatient nnat nnrisk nnfor nnunintentional nnretained nnforeign nnobjects nn(RFOs). nnWhat nnnew nnand nnevolving nnrisk nnreduction nnstrategy nncould nnprevent nnRFOs nnand nnfrustrating, nntime-consuming nnmiscount nnadventures nnat nnthe nnend nnof nnthese nnprocedures? nn- nncorrect nnanswer's nnReplacing nnor nntagging nnsponges nnand nnlaparotomy nninstruments nnwith nnradiofrequency nnidentification nn(RFID) nnchips A nnfemale nnpatient nnwith nnend-stage nnpancreatic nncancer nnwas nnadmitted nnfrom nnhospice nnfor nna nnceliac nnplexus nnblock nnto nntreat nnintractable nnpain. nnShe nnhad nna nnWhipple nnprocedure nn18 nnmonths nnearlier nnand nnenjoyed nna nngood nnquality nnof nnlife nnuntil nn3 nnweeks nnago. nnShe nnwanted nnto nnbe nnable nnto nncomplete nn"getting nnher nnthings nnin nnorder" nnand nnsaying nngood -bye nnto nnher nnfriends nnand nnfamily nnwhile nnenjoying nnher nnlast nndays nnpain-
free. nnThe nnpatient nninsisted nnthat nnher nnDo nnNot nnResuscitate nn(DNR) nnstatus nnNOT nnbe nnrescinded. nnShe nnwas nnconscious nnand nncompe tent nnand nnknew nnwhat nnwas nnbest nnfor nnherself. nnThe nnpatient nnwas nntaking nnfull nnadvantage nnof nnwhat nnprovision nnfor nnher nncare? nn- nncorrect nnanswer's nnPSDA nnand nnadvance nndirectives A nnpatient nnwas nnpresented nnwith nnthe nnprepared nninformed nnconsent nnform nnduring nnthe nndiscussion nnwith nnher nnsurgeon nnconcerning nnher nnscheduled nnvaginal -assisted nnlaparoscopic nnhysterectomy. nnShe nndemonstrated nnand nnverbalized nnthat nnshe nnunderstood nnall nnof nnthe nntenets nnof nnthe nnprocedure, nnrisks, nnexpected nnoutcome, nncomplications, nnand nnprocedural nnprocess. nnBefore nnshe nnsigned nnthe nnconsent nnform, nnshe nninformed nnthe nnsurgeon nnthat nnshe nndid nnnot nnwant nnany nnmedical nnstudents nnor nnsurgical nnresidents nnperforming nnany nnparts nnof nnthe nnprocedure nnother nnthan nnassisting nnand nndid nnnot nnwant nnany nnphotographs nnof nnher nnbody nntaken. nnThe nnsurgeon nnagreed, nnand nnshe nncrossed nnout nnthose nnportions nnof nnthe nnform nnand nninitialed nnthem nnbefore nnshe nnsigned. nnThe nnpatient nnwas nnexercising nnher: nn- nncorrect nnanswer's nnright nnto nninformed nnconsent. Early nnon, nnduring nnthe nnpreliminary nnsponge nncount nnon nnclosure nnof nna nnrepair nnof nna nnruptured nnabdominal nnaortic nnaneurysm, nnthe nncircul ating nnnurse nnwas nnunable nnto nnaccount nnfor nn2 nnlap nnsponges. nnHe nnhad nnmeticulously nnmaintained nnaccountability nnfor nnall nnsponges nnand nninstruments nndiscarded nnfrom nnthe nnsterile nnfield nnand nnbagged nneach nnsponge nncarefully. nnHe nnimmediately nnturned nnand nnaddressed nnthe nnentire nnteam nnin nna nnclear nnvoice. nnSelect nnthe nnappropriate nncommunication nnthat nnthe nncirculating nnnurse nnmust nnemploy nnduring nnthis nncount nndiscrepancy. nn- nncorrect nnanswer's nn"We nnhave nna nncount nndiscrepancy. nnWe nnstarted nnwith nn70 nnsponges nnand nnfind nnonly nn68. nnWe nnare nnmissing nn2 nnlap nnsponges. nnEveryone, nnplease nncheck nnyour nnareas.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Mboffin. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for £8.97. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
77254 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now