Summary
Summary Duty of Care- Acts
Summary study book Tort Law of Nicholas J. Mcbride, Roderick Bagshaw - ISBN: 9781292071237, Edition: 5, Year of publication: - (Duty of Care- Acts.)
[Show more]
Connected book
Book Title:
Author(s):
- Edition:
- ISBN:
- Edition:
Content preview
Chapter 6: Duty of care- acts6.1 The basics:
Chapter focuses where D has performed a positive act that has resulted in the claimant
suffering some kind of harm.
Claimant has to show that D breached a duty of care that was geared towards protecting her
from the harm, for which she wants to sue the D. has to be a link.
A lot harder to establish that a D owed a claimant a duty of care that was geared towards
protecting her from suffering pure economic loss than it is to establish that a D owed the
claimant a duty of care that was geared towards protecting her from suffering physical
injury.
Physical harm-> has to establish that it was reasonably foreseeable that the D’s actions
would result in the C’s suffering some kind of physical injury.
Property damage-> has to establish that it was reasonably foreseeable that the D’s actions
would result in property being damaged and the C had a sufficient interest in the property at
the time it was damaged as a result of the D’s actions.
Psychiatric illness-> has to establish that it was reasonably foreseeable that the D’s actions
would result in the C suffering some form of psychiatric illness and there was a sufficient
degree of proximity between the D’s actions and the C’s suffering the illness.
Pure economic loss-> has to establish that there was a special relationship between the D
and the C, or special circumstances that would make it ‘fair, just and reasonable’ to find that
the D owed the C a duty of care geared protecting the C from suffering some kind of pure
economic loss.
Pure distress.
Easier to prove property damage than psychiatric illness.
McLoughlin v O’Brian [1983] -> Lord Scarman was in favour of the courts simply finding such
a duty of care whenever it was reasonably foreseeable that a D’s actions would result in C
suffering psychiatric illness.
Page v Smith [1996] -> D carelessly ran into the C’s car while the claimant was sitting in it. C
was uninjured but the experience caused him to suffer a renewed onset of CFS (previously
suffering with this but managed to overcome). C sued the D in negligence for compensation
for his CFS (psychiatric illness). HL held it was unnecessary for the claimant to have to show
that the D breached a duty of care that was geared towards protecting the claimant from
suffering a psychiatric illness. It was enough if the claimant could establish that his
psychiatric illness resulted from the D’s breaching a duty of care that was geared towards
protecting the claimant from suffering a physical injury. C was able to satisfy the condition. D
owed C a duty of care not to crash into the C’s car based on the fact that it was reasonably
foreseeable that doing so would result in the claimant suffering some kind of physical injury.
Page= unorthodox in that it allows a claimant to sue for one kind of harm based on the
breach of duty of care geared towards protecting the claimant from suffering another kind
of harm.
Rothwell v Chemical & Insulating Co Ltd [2007] -> HL sought to limit Page.
Page didn’t apply to Coleman v British Gas [2002]
Page-> has to be an immediate psychiatric illness as consequence of D’s actions.
How to determine whether it was reasonably foreseeable that a D’s actions would result in a
claimant suffering some kind of kind of harm?
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller topqualitynotes. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for £2.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
75632 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now