Lecture notes
Oxford Privity lecture Notes
- Module
- Contract Law
- Institution
- University Of Oxford
This is a comprehensive and detailed note on privity of contract for Contract law. Essential!! To your success in academics!!
[Show more]
Content preview
What is privity of contract?- General rule in English law (different to civil law systems) is that a
contract can only create rights and obligations for the parties to the
contract
- Established in the 1800s in Tweddle v Atkinson – contract
between bride’s father and groom’s father to give the couple a
marriage settlement couldn’t be enforced by the groom, even
though it specifically provided that he could
- Reasserted by Dunlop v Selfridge – tyre manufacturer couldn’t
enforce an agreement between their distributor and a retailer
that they wouldn’t sell below the manufacturer’s listed prices
– also made clear that privity and consideration are related
but separate doctrines
- Judgments actually suggested that the manufacturer
could have been a party to the contract with the
distributor contracting as their agent – but this wouldn’t
have helped because there was still no consideration
- Confirmed again and applied to negative rights/exemption
clauses in Scruttons v Midland Silicone
- As regards rights for third parties the rule has been criticised a lot
for causing injustice – there are a number of common law
exceptions where the contract can create rights for third parties –
and now we have a wide statutory exception in the Contracts
(Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999
- In multi-party contractual arrangements the parties often have
their own arrangements set up to deal with the privity
doctrine – e.g. chains of liability in the construction industry
where the main contractor is liable to the employer but can
then also recover from the subcontractors – it doesn’t make
sense for the courts to interfere by recognising further rights
between non-contracting parties – recognised in Norwich CC v
Harvey
- But more liberal approach following Henderson v Merrett
Syndicates – negligence DoCs can both get round chains of
contractual liability and be concurrent with contractual liability
- As regards obligations for third parties the rule is less controversial
because imposing duties through other people’s contracts would be
seen as a big infringement of liberty – but there are still some duties
in tort law to respect other people’s contracts
Enforcement by the promisee
- Sometimes the promisee can enforce the promise for the benefit of
the third party – either getting specific performance or damages
which can be passed on to them
- But not always – specific performance isn’t always available –
and damages can normally only be recovered for loss that you
have suffered, not third party losses
- Beswick v Beswick – claimant sued to enforce a contract the
promisor had made with her dead husband to pay her an
annuity, both in her own name and on behalf of her husband’s
, estate – she couldn’t enforce it as not a party, estate couldn’t
recover damages as had suffered no loss, but on behalf of the
estate she could have an order for specific performance
- But this is an unusual case – specific performance often
isn’t available
- If the promisor breaches a promise not to sue a third party, the
promisee can sometimes enforce this by getting a stay of
proceedings – but only if they have a particular interest in the
enforcement of the promise, e.g. because they’ve indemnified the
third party for their liability (Gore v Van der Lann)
- Snelling v Snelling Ltd – directors of a company could enforce
an agreement not to sue the company because they had such
a close connection to it
- Promisee could also recover damages and hold them on trust for the
third party – this is most significant in practice due to limited
availability of specific performance
- Any breach of contract gives an automatic right to damages –
but you will normally only get nominal damages unless you
have suffered loss yourself
- E.g. Beswick – HL assumed that estate could not have
recovered more than nominal damages which was why
specific performance was necessary
- Some exceptions where the promisee can recover damages
for the third party’s loss:
- The Albazero exception – a party to a contract relating
to property can recover for a third party’s losses if it was
within the parties’ contemplation that the property
would be transferred to the third party
- CA extended this to construction contracts made
for the benefit of a third party in Darlington BC v
Wiltshier Northern
- But HL refused to apply it to a construction
contract where the third party had their own
contractual remedy in Alfred McAlpine v Panatown
- The Albazero also held that it doesn’t apply if the
third party is going to enter their own contract
with the promisor
- Jackson v Horizon Holidays – if one person makes a
contract on behalf of a group (e.g. father booking a
holiday for his family) they can recover damages for the
whole group
- But HL held in Woodar v Wimpey that it doesn’t
apply in the commercial context – and were
divided on whether they approved of the decision
at all
- Lord Wilberforce – doesn’t like it
- Lord Scarman – if the promisee contracts for
the benefit of the group they see the benefit
to the group as a benefit to themselves –
they should be compensated for non-
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller anyiamgeorge19. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for £9.79. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
77254 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now