Summary
Summary Intoxication Scenario Plan
- Module
- Intoxication
- Institution
- WJEC
A clearly structured intoxication scenario plan. Used for WJEC exam but applicable for other exam boards. Cases are included. A* standard.
[Show more]
Seller
Follow
Content preview
Intoxication Specific intent – crimes that can only be satisfied through
intention e.g. theft.
Basic intent – crimes that can be satisfied either through intention
or recklessness.
Specific Intent Basic Intent
Voluntary If D is so intoxicated Voluntary intoxication
Intoxication that he cannot form is NEVER a defence for
the mens rea, he is not basic intent offences.
guilty.
Involuntary Can be used as a Can be used as a
Intoxication defence but must defence but must
mean that D can’t mean that D can’t
form the necessary form the necessary
mens rea. mens rea.
Murder
Sheehan and Moore – Ds were drunk when they threw petrol over a
tramp and set fire to him. They were too drunk to have formed any
intent to kill or cause GBH. Because they did not have the MR for
murder, they were able to use intoxication as a defence. They were
found guilty of manslaughter as a basic intent offence. Voluntary
intoxication can negate the MR for the specific intent
offence of murder.
R v Lipman – D had taken LSD. He hallucinated and believed he was
being attacked by snakes. He killed his girlfriend by cramming
bedsheets into her mouth. Intoxication cannot be used as a
defence to manslaughter, as it is a crime of basic intent.
AG v Gallagher – Drunken intent is still intent. Dutch courage
cannot be used as a defence.
Voluntary Intoxication
DPP v Majewski – voluntary intoxication is not a defence for
basic intent crimes.
Hardie – D set fire to his girlfriend’s wardrobe after taking Valium. If
D takes a drug, the intoxication might be involuntary if he
expected it to have the opposite effect.
R v Allen – if D mistakes the strength of alcohol, it is still
voluntary intoxication.
Kingston – D was drugged by blackmailers. D was then shown a 15-
year-old boy and was invited to abuse him. If D still has the mens
rea they cannot rely on the defence of involuntary
intoxication.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller eleanortrend. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for £2.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
73243 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now