100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary ECHR overviews for articles 6,8,10 and 11 £4.44   Add to cart

Summary

Summary ECHR overviews for articles 6,8,10 and 11

 10 views  0 purchase

Brief summaries of all key points to mention when applying ECHR articles 6,8, 10 or 11 in an exam. Includes relevant case examples and provides a framework for answering application questions.

Preview 1 out of 4  pages

  • August 1, 2024
  • 4
  • 2022/2023
  • Summary
All documents for this subject (1)
avatar-seller
sophieallen
ARTICLE 6 ECHR

establish standing

- (against state or state body -s.6 HRA)
- must be sufficiently affected
- can sue against private company by using art 6 and relevant domestic law

part absolute right, part limited right

absolute- has there been an interference with the individuals convention right? if yes there is a
breach

limited - does interference fall within a lawful exception? if not there is a breach

protects citizen against abuse of power by state authorities

however in certain situations rights are waived eg settling using adr

some additional rights have been implies by the EctHR

including the right to not self-incriminate, access to court and equality of arms. these are not
absolute and may be restricted if proportionate/in public interest

art 6 rights [1]

- civil rights and obligations - entitled to fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an
independent and impartial tribunal, including appeals etc. for this to apply, there must be an
issue of genuine and serious nature
- criminal charge - additional protection offered under 6[2] and [3], the word ‘determination’
has caused issues deciding when a criminal case should start (brown v stott)
- access to court - implied so state may impose procedural restrictions, must have fair and
public hearing for everyone. if right to appeal exists then this applies to appeals too.
restrctions: no vexatious litigants, 3 year limitation period for personal injury claims, judges
have immunity of suit from judicial decisions (Osman v uk)
- fair hearing - not defined but appears to include equality of arms, presumption of innocence
and privilege of self incrimination. if breached, decision is unsafe and discarded (Pinochet)

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller sophieallen. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £4.44. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

60904 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now

Start selling
£4.44
  • (0)
  Add to cart