100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary Democracy and Participation in the US £11.16   Add to cart

Summary

Summary Democracy and Participation in the US

 12 views  0 purchase

includes - electoral college and voting behaviour

Preview 1 out of 4  pages

  • August 6, 2024
  • 4
  • 2024/2025
  • Summary
All documents for this subject (21)
avatar-seller
sophieallsop97
Democracy & Participation: Summary

1. Invisible primary – establishing themselves as a potential nominee (18 months before polling day)
 Trump attacked Jeb Bush on twitter so he withdrew in 2016
 $750 million spent in 2008 campaign by the democrats
2. Primaries/caucuses – public vote for the nomination of their party – can be open or closed
 Can be won proportionally/winner takes all/proportional unless a threshold is reached
 Frontloading: moving them earlier to give them more significance. In 2016 Trump gained a majority
of delegates on 26th May, but 7 states had not held their primaries yet
 Super Tuesday – 2008 Super Duper Tuesday
3. National party convention – party nomination for president and VP and police platform
 Obama 2007 speech had an audience of 39mil on television
 Party unity - 2008 Clinton - 'I am honoured to be here tonight. A proud mother. A proud democrat. A
proud American. And a proud support of Barack Obama.'
 Despite #NeverTrump he won 69.8% of the vote
4. The election campaign – Battleground states (swing state), Bellwether states
 In 2016 - 94% of events by either Trump/Pence/Clinton/Kaine took place in just 12 states. Governor
Scott Walker: 'The nation as a whole is not going to elect the next president. 12 states are'
 Republicans visited Florida 71 times, Texas and NYC only once
 Television debates – 2016 Clinton appeared to have won it through a poll conducted after
5. Electoral college – 583 delegates from 50 states decide the president. Requires 270 to win.
 Faithless electors – in 2016 there were 10 faithless, 3 had to vote again as they had broken state law,
7 successfully cast their ballot
 4 times in a row the opponent has won the popular vote, but not become president – an illusion

EC IS GOOD: produces a clear winner (apart from 1800 and 1824), federalism as it protects smaller states that would
be rendered insignificant in comparison to California (could be overrepresentation though), forces candidates to
compete, protects against popularism and promotes suitability, culturally enshrined.

EC IS BAD: backwards elections in 1824/1976/1888/2000/2016, the original purpose of the EC protecting against
tyranny of the majority is no longer relevant as they would never overturn the vote, no opportunity for 3 rd parties,
politicians favour states with more ECVs, mathematically the Wyoming votes are more valuable than Californian
votes, system is not well understood, faithless electors.

Reforms: abolition (would be unpopular in smaller states), split electors by district (occurs already in Maine and
Nebraska), National Popular Vote Interstate Compact (adopted by 11 states and DC, pledges to give the ECV to the
person who wins the popular vote)

Campaign finance: 2012 campaign both candidates raised over $1bn each

a. PACs – no more than $5000 per candidate per election
b. Super PACs – unlimited funds to support or oppose any candidate but not coordinate with those campaigns.
c. 527 groups – raise unlimited funds for political activity but not for/against a specific candidate
d. Dark money

Reforms: 1974 Federal Election Campaign Act (legal limits to contribution), 2002 Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act
(banned soft money to national parties, limits to $2000)

- 2010 supreme court ruling: Citizens United v Federal Election Commission – removed restriction on
fundraising that was independent of candidates’ campaigns which led to Super PACs
- Barriers to further reform – Citizens United v FEC (constitution prevents limits as free speech) and lawmakers
are benefitting of current rule so there is no incentive to reform.
- Proposed constitutional amendments – Democracy For All Amendment and We Are The People Amendment

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller sophieallsop97. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £11.16. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

73091 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now

Start selling
£11.16
  • (0)
  Add to cart