STRUCTURES ANSWER OUTLINE: Step-by-step framework to tackle problems involving confidentiality and disclosure.
SAMPLE PARAGRAPHS: Model answers that show you how to balance competing duties effectively.
KEY STRATEGIES: Practical tips to analyze and resolve conflicts, enhancing your answers.
SG1: Conflict of Duties (Confidentiality / Disclosure)
Can we act for a partner if we have previously acted for the firm?
Key issue - do you have confidential information about (the other partners) that
might prevent you acting for (potential client)?
That would give rise to a conflict between your duties under paragraph 6.3 and
paragraph 6.4
Para 6.3 of the Code of Conduct for Solicitors (the Code) provides that there is
duty of confidentiality:
“You [must] keep the affairs of the current and former clients confidential unless
disclosure is required or permitted by law or the client consents.”
• This duty is owed to (potential client), but also to (the other partners) as former
clients.
• (The firm) is not a separate legal personality because it is not incorporated – so
when acting for (the firm) means that you act for each of (the partners).
• (The other partners) are former clients to who you owe a duty of confidentiality.
Para 6.4 of the Code provides for a duty of disclosure
“Where you are acting for a client on a matter, you make the client aware of all
information material to the matter of which you have knowledge….” [subject to
limited exceptions]
• We have a duty to (potential client) to make her aware of all the information
material to the mater of which we have knowledge.
• So, if you had information about (the other partners) that was material to
(potential client)’s matter, you would not be able to disclose that to her without
breaching your duty to (the other partners) under para 6.3.
• There is conflict between those two duties.
• Para 6.3 (confidentiality) takes priority over para 6.4 (disclosure).
• That would prevent you from acting for (potential client) unless one of the
exceptions to the duty of disclosure applied – none apply here.
• [The only potentially relevant exception would be 6.4(b), which would require
(potential client) to have given her written informed consent – that would mean
that you are not acting in her bests interests and possibly put you in breach of
principle 7 of the SRA principles.]
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller SheDoesLaw. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for £10.46. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
