Summary
Summary Chandler: International Justice
- Institution
- SOAS , University Of London (SOAS)
history of sovereignty and sovereign equality
[Show more]
Seller
Follow
Content preview
Chandler: International Justicehistory of sovereignty and sovereign equality
● state equality is understood as an integral part of state sovereignty
○ Treaty of Westphalia 1648 → “no external power beyond that of the
sovereign”
■ became bases of international relations
■ originally restricted to Europe, used to justify intervention
■ because colonies did not have “empirical statehood” like them,
sovereignty did not apply
■ before intl law, IR came in the form of voluntary agreements between
sovereign states (ex. strategic alliances)
● Westphalian model came under attack with the growing importance of Non-European
states
○ Hague Conference (1899) had China, Japan, Ottoman Empire, etc.
○ Japan defeating Russia 1905 started conversations about assumptions of
racial superiority
○ 2nd Hague Conference (1907) → European countries outnumbered
○ WWI was the turning point towards juridical sovereignty:
● Woodrow Wilson at 1919 Paris Peace Conference → principle was originally
just for the new Central European states
○ Robert Lansing → the implications of this towards racial relations is
dangerous
● League of Nations mandate system
○ recognition that colonial rule could only be temporary → empire no
longer legitimate
○ sovereign equality still applied to a select few.
● WWII → UN Charter
○ emergence of the USSR, national liberation struggles in Asia, Middle East,
Africa, ideologies of race and empire gone now that Nazis were defeated
○ led to nominal great-power acceptance of a law-bound intl system
○ concept of sovereign equality:
■ intl community recognises states as equal
■ Article 2(1) — the principle of sovereign equality
■ Article 1(2) and 55 — the respect for the principle of equal
rights and self-determination of peoples
■ new nations granted sovereign rights, while sovereignty of state
powers had to be restricted
■ legal restrictions on the right to wage war
■ legal authority now not from wealth/ might but from nationhood.
○ the UN did not realise full sovereign equality !!
■ SC and the issue with P5
■ (UNGA gives equal rep, though.)
○ principle of non-intervention:
■ legal monopoly on the use of force resides in the UN
■ Article 2(4) — all members shall refrain in their intl relations from the
threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political
independence of any state, or in any manner consistent with the
purposes of the UN
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller menelekmansouri. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for £9.36. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
79223 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now