Bullet-point essay revision plan written by a student aiming for top grades. Discusses the statement 'Critically compare the sanctity of life with autonomy as principles for judging the issue of euthanasia'. Includes scholars such as Lantantius/Dworkin/Hans Küng/Aquinas/Fletcher/Kant/Singer/Glove...
Critically compare the sanctity of life with autonomy as principles for judging the issue of
euthanasia.
Intro:
• Sanctity of Life - intrinsic value of human life
> central to Catholicism
> Strong SofL - life must be preserved at all costs
> Weak SofL - life is a gift, not a burden
• Contrast to Quality of Life principles
> focus on autonomy
Thesis:
• Principles of autonomy are more convincing/logical approaches to judging the issue of
euthanasia
> We cultivate our own lives - should not be held responsible to some external higher
power
> that is not compassionate/omnibenevolent of any God
• Principles of autonomy can be supported by theists - compatible with weak SofL
principles
> life is a gift - not a burden
> SE - shows agape love towards yourself and others
• Absolutist moral laws such as NL that campaign for SofL principles neglect the true
reality + complexities of individual medical situations
> can lead to more harm than good
Sanctity of Life:
• Protection = prerequisite to life
> life is a gift from God - blasphemous to deny the gift
> must be protected at all costs
> God created life - only God can end life
> once life is gone - all other gifts are lost
• Central to Catholicism
> there is a closeness between God + humanity
> special covenants
> imagio dei - special purpose
• Early Christian thinker - Lantantius
> God made humans a sacred species - humans have sanctity/divinity
• However - principles of autonomy do not deny the intrinsic value/dignity of human life
> Actually - it reinforces it
> Dworkin - life has value but also quality
> euthanasia can be a way of reaffirming life’s eudamonic quality
> allowing someone to experience immense suffering undermines a person’s dignity to
live a life of quality
> certainly - humans are sacred beings in the sense that medical attempts to reduce
suffering should be made
> however - it is not our duty to endure suffering
> Catholics can agree with this
Natural Law:
• Aquinas - ‘Summa Theologica’
> outlines his deontological/absolutist NL that reinforces SofL principle
> rejects euthanasia unless absolute final resort
> a threat to society - a sign that society has failed some of its members
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Kitty06. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for £5.76. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
