100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Cambridge AS Psychology Paper 2 Revision Notes £9.00   Add to cart

Other

Cambridge AS Psychology Paper 2 Revision Notes

 11 views  0 purchase

Paper 2 detailed revision notes that cover research methods, methodological concepts, issues and debates, and data analysis Notes made by 2 students who achieved an A in their AS exam

Preview 4 out of 39  pages

  • August 16, 2024
  • 39
  • 2024/2025
  • Other
  • Unknown
All documents for this subject (312)
avatar-seller
ariannaviscardi
Research Methods

1. Experiments
- Compare data from two or more experimental groups to look for a cause-effect relationship
- Control group → provides a baseline for comparison

● IV → what you manipulate/control
● DV → What you measure


2 types of Experiments:
Laboratory Experiments
Location
- Setting where the researcher has high levels of control
- Ex: light, temperature, noise…
- Ex locations: schools, clinics, hospitals, universities, private research institutes
Control
- Controlled variables are kept the same between all levels of the IV
- This makes sure the IV is causing the DV


Strength Weakness

Reliability • Standardized and replicable → each participant in
each condition has the same experience, consistency

Validity • High levels of control increase validity as cause and • Low ecological validity → not realistic environment
effect can be established • if participants figure out the aim of the study they will
show demand characteristics
• pilot studies can be conducted to identify uncontrolled
variables

Ethics • Consent is taken (not always informed) • deception may be used to hide the aim of the study and
• Right to withdraw increase validity
• Debrief at the end
• Respect the participant’s psychological state of mind


Examples of studies that used Laboratory experiments:
Pozzulo et al: asked participants to observe video clips in a controlled setting before identifying target
Dement and Kleitman: participants slept in a controlled setting and woke up in REM or nREM

, Field Experiments
Location
- Real-world setting
- IV manipulated
- DV measured
- There may be uncontrolled variables
- Ex locations: Street, workplace, supermarket, sports event, public transport
Control
- Researchers still try to maintain control over other variables but it's much harder
- Uncontrolled, situational variables make it much harder to draw firm conclusions




Strength Weakness

Reliabilit • Results are compared with control group → provides a • Less control over extraneous variables
y baseline for comparison • Difficult to standardize and replicate

Validity • High ecological validity → more natural environment
• Results are generalizable
• Reduces demand characteristics → unaware they are observed

Ethics • No consent as participants often do not know the
are taking part in the research
• Participants are deceived
• No right to withdraw + no debriefing



Examples of studies that used field experiments:
Piliavin et al: Carried out an experiment on an express train between two NY stations, researchers
manipulated the type of victim, condition, and whether help was offered or not

, Experimental designs:
→ how participants are allocated to the different levels of the IV


Independent measures design
→ experimental design where each participant takes part in a different condition of the IV


- Participants are put into 2 or more different groups, this depends on the levels of the IV
- These groups are called the experimental and control group
- The control group provides a baseline to which the researcher can compare data
- Each condition has a different group of participants


Strength Weakness

Independent Validity Validity
measures • Prevents order effects • more people needed → time consuming
design → participants take part in 1 condition only • participant variables may affect the results
• reduces demand characteristics
→ prevents participants from finding out the aim of the study


RANDOM ALLOCATION → eliminates participant variables by randomly allocating participants
to different conditions

Studies that used independent measures designs:
Andrade: randomly allocated participants to the doodle or non-doodle condition
Piliavin et al: tested participants with either an ill or drunk victim

, Repeated measures design
→ An experimental design in which each participant takes part in every level of the IV

- The same group of participants provides data for all levels of the IV
- Participant variables cannot affect the validity of data as participants take part in all conditions


Strength Weakness

Repeated measures Validity Validity
design • Participant variables are reduced • Risk of demand characteristics → threat validity
• Fewer people needed • Risk of order effects


COUNTERBALANCING → used to prevent order effects (ABBA method)

Studies that used repeated measures designs:
Dement and Kleitman: compared recall of dreams from REM and nREM sleep for each participant
Perry et al: All participants were tested with and without OT


Matched pairs design
→ An experimental design in which participants are matched in pairs based on variables that could
affect the results. One member of each pair takes part in a different level if the IV

- Each participant in the experimental group will be matched with a participant in the control group
- Every participant in the experimental group will have a person in the control group who’s similar to
them on key variables (Ex: handedness, gender, socioeconomic status, or age)


Strength Weakness

Matched pairs Validity Validity
design • reduced participant variables • difficult to match people accurately
• reduced order effects • time-consuming to match pairs
• if one participant drops out you lose two participants' da


Studies that used matched pairs designs:
Bandura: Children were matched on aggression levels
Baron-Cohen: 14 participants in G4 were matched on IQ with G1 HFA/AS participants

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller ariannaviscardi. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £9.00. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

67232 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now

Start selling
£9.00
  • (0)
  Add to cart