100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
La 104; Mens Rea - Intention and Recklessness Notes £9.79   Add to cart

Lecture notes

La 104; Mens Rea - Intention and Recklessness Notes

 5 views  0 purchase

This is a comprehensive and detailed note on Mens Rea - Intention and Recklessness (lectures, textbook and articles) included. *Essential!! * Precise!! * For you!!

Preview 2 out of 15  pages

  • August 17, 2024
  • 15
  • 2021/2022
  • Lecture notes
  • Prof. victor
  • All classes
All documents for this subject (12)
avatar-seller
anyiamgeorge19
Introduction to Mens Rea Mens Rea in relation to Actus
Reus
= internal element: the guilty mind STRICT LIABILITY

• degree of fault: = no req for MR
blameworthiness/culpability (AR w/ no corresponding MR)

Conduct = voluntary 1. Strict/absolute offences

Circumstance/Result = =Only MR req: act Voluntary
a. Intention - No MR as to other element of off
b. Recklessness
• Majority: Regulatory offences (quasi-
Sweet v Parsley [1970] crim)
No longer lived in farmhouse, rented rooms Justification:
out to tenants, retained room but only went - not that serious
occasionally to collect mail + rent Attract limited punishment to reflect lack of
- Cannabis resin found on premises MR
MR required where the offence is a ‘true Problems:
crime’ (not regulatory offence) - Lack respect for principle of
• IF section silent as to MR: autonomy (offences punish D for AR
presumption that to give effect to the w/out regard to D’s choice to bring it
will of Par, must read in words approp about: state of mind)
to require MR - not all SL = quasi

----------------------------------------------------------- 2. Strict liability elements

IMPORTANCE OF MR (more common)
= offences which req MR for certain AR
X looking at different degrees of fault = elements (not all)
respecting individuals as autonomous + - Where not req, liab strict
responsible agents
(Fairness imp in distrib of blame) • Less controversial then absolute
offences w/out MR as to
Legitimises application of crim liab circumstances + results
Responsible for conduct + consequences = HWVR autonomy issue
can be blamed - Liab possible in absence of choice to
- Made choice to commit crime essential part of what D is being
autonomously blamed for
HWVR
Limits application of crim liab

, Only blamed for actions + conseq which they • Counter-weighed x defences to
can be held responsible for otherwise SL offences
a. due diligence
----------------------------------------------------------- - took all reasonable steps to avoid offence
b. reasonable excuse
SUBJECTIVE MR
= Culpability based on D’s own state of mind • B.o.P shifts to D: prove lack of
- Desired (intention) + foresaw culpability
(recklessness)
• SL ONLY applied x court if obvious in
OBJECTIVE MR drafting of offence that Parliament
= categories establish culpability x comparing intended it
D’s conduct, perspective + decisions w/ - PRESUMPTION IN FAVOUR OF MR
objective standard of care (RP) -----------------------------------------------------------
- Should have thought + done
(negligence) ULTERIOR MR

----------------------------------------------------------- = MR element does not have corresponding
AR element
Four Functions of MR – Winnie Chan
‘Ulterior intention’
• Establish the moral innocence/guilt of
D’s conduct • MR requirement not correspond to
• Articulating + notifying limits of conduct, circumstance / result
freedom element of AR
• Secure fair warning: ensure have suff
advance notice that risking crim law • No need to do AR
• Mediating role: protect potential V + - intend/reckless as to doing AR
preserve liberties of potential D - w/out needing for it to actually happen
(expl why negl rarely used in serious
offences) a. Criminal Damage

----------------------------------------------------------- ELEMENT AR MR
Conduct A/O = result Voluntary
PRESUMPTION IN FAVOUR OF MR Circumstanc Property Intention
e damaged /
Where offence sets out certain AR + silent as belonging to Reckless
to MR = presumption MR required as to the another
element Result Damage / Intention
Destruction /
B (a minor) v DPP [2000] of Property Reckless

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller anyiamgeorge19. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £9.79. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

77254 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now

Start selling
£9.79
  • (0)
  Add to cart