MRL3701 ASSIGNMENT 1 SEMESTER 2 - 2024
DUE DATE: 30 AUGUST 2024
1. Case name:
Amod v Khan 1947 (2) SA 432 (N)
2. Ratio decidendi of the case:
Even when all the requirements of section 12 were complied with, the court retained its discretion to grant or refuse a sequestration order.
...
2. Ratio decidendi of the case: Even when all the requirements of section 12 were complied
with, the court retained its discretion to grant or refuse a sequestration order.
3. Area of Insolvency Law applicable: Compulsory Sequestration.
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Masters. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for £2.24. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.