100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Pearson Edexcel A-Level History Coursework: 'Historians have disagreed about the origins of the Cold War. What is your view about the reasons for the start of the Cold War?' £7.99
Add to cart

Essay

Pearson Edexcel A-Level History Coursework: 'Historians have disagreed about the origins of the Cold War. What is your view about the reasons for the start of the Cold War?'

26 reviews
 4920 views  96 purchases

This is a 4000 word essay answering the question 'What is your view about the reasons for the start of the Cold War?'. I achieved 39/40 (A*) on this coursework. The three historians that I used were Schlesinger, LaFeber and Williams.

Preview 1 out of 10  pages

  • November 16, 2019
  • 10
  • 2018/2019
  • Essay
  • Unknown
  • Unknown
All documents for this subject (59)

26  reviews

review-writer-avatar

By: nselcraig • 1 month ago

review-writer-avatar

By: rosshanirajkamal • 1 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: danichalmers1 • 1 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: andrewguppy • 1 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: judekayakiran • 1 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: kasperl • 1 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: hfhennessy10 • 1 year ago

Show more reviews  
avatar-seller
rsvmanu
Rahul Vij


Historians have disagreed about the reasons for the starts of the Cold War.
What is your view about the reasons for the start of the Cold War?
With reference to three chosen works:
 Analyse the ways in which the interpretations of the question, problem or issue
differ
 Explain the differences you have identified
 Evaluate the arguments, indicating which you found most persuasive and
explaining your judgements




Arthur Schlesinger Jr blames Russia’s problematic view of world order, which was based
upon the Soviet sense of insecurity and the desire to expand Russian territory, as a root
cause of the Cold War. He argues the Kremlin had a specific, non-negotiable view of how the
world should move on following the conclusion of World War II, which initially strained the
relationship between Russia and America. The Russian leaders believed that each great
power should have an “acknowledged predominance in its own area of special interest.” 1
This is known as the ‘sphere-of-influence’ view and involves “sharp contradictions” 2 with
America’s universalist view. Schlesinger underlines one main reason as to why Americans
were against any agreements about spheres of influence, and the dangers of such
agreements. He believes that dividing the world is “inherently unstable” 3 as it promotes
competition instead of co-operation between the great powers. The Americans realised that
this solution would eventually lead to a third world war. Schlesinger clearly feels that
universalism was the obvious approach, yet the Kremlin refused to even consider America’s
universalist view. This could be ascribed to the Soviet sense of insecurity. An American
universalist approach to the post-war world exacerbated Russians’ worst fears as it would
leave their national security in the hands of other nations. Historically, Russia has been a
target for invasion, having been invaded in 1812 by the French and in 1941 by the Nazis.
Russia’s history of invasion, compounded with the terrible losses the Russian army suffered
in World War II, has led most people to consider Stalin’s priority of protecting his borders
from future attack reasonable. In fact, Schlesinger notes that “the Americans were perfectly
ready to acknowledge that Russia was entitled to convincing assurance of her national
security.”4 This suggests that the US were willing to compromise and guarantee Russia’s
security, but Russia continued to selfishly pursue their ‘sphere-of-influence’ policy. This left
the US with no choice but to believe that Russia’s motives for expanding their sphere of
influence went further than security issues. The evidence for this can be seen through
Stalin’s ‘salami tactics’ when taking over Eastern Europe and Soviet involvement in Iran.
Schlesinger acknowledges that many historians believe that Truman’s policies “left Moscow

1
Arthur M. Schlesinger Jr, Origins of the Cold War, (1967), p. 26
2
Arthur M. Schlesinger Jr, Origins of the Cold War, (1967), p. 26
3
Arthur M. Schlesinger Jr, Origins of the Cold War, (1967), p. 36
4
Arthur M. Schlesinger Jr, Origins of the Cold War, (1967), p. 37

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller rsvmanu. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £7.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

48072 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 15 years now

Start selling
£7.99  96x  sold
  • (26)
Add to cart
Added