This document is a detailed essay plan for a unit 3 scenario question on strict liability.
I have used the IDEA structure as provided by the WJEC guidance. You can use the same material for each strict liability scenario, adjusting the application (as highlighted on the document in blue) each ti...
The scenario is concerned with the issue of strict liability offences. We must
consider the actions of (defendant in the scenario) and the wording in the statute in
light of relevant case law. In defining and explaining the relevant law, it will be
possible to establish whether (offence in scenario) is one of strict liability.
Most crimes require both actus reus and mens rea. However, for strict liability
offences, only the actus reus must be proved to establish liability. There are also
absolute liability offences which require evidence of actus reus only but are not
concerned with whether the actus reus is voluntary. For example, in Larsonneur
(1933) a French National was brought to the UK from Ireland in police custody
against her will and was arrested on arrival for being an illegal alien even though
she had no desire to come to the UK. Acts often do not state whether an offence is
one of strict liability, so it is down to judges to decide.
In Gammon (HK) Ltd v Attorney General (1985), where builders had failed to follow
exact plans and part of the building they had constructed collapsed, it was
confirmed that the starting point for a judge is always to presume that mens rea is
required before a person is found guilty of a criminal offence. This case laid out four
factors the courts need to consider in determining if an offence is one of strict
liability, often known as the Gammon factors.
Identify: Is the offence regulatory in nature or a true crime?
Define: If the offence is regulatory in nature, meaning it is not criminal, minor or
has no moral issue involved, it is more likely to be classed as strict liability. In Sweet
v Parsley (1970), the defendant was convicted under s5 Dangerous Drugs Act 1965
when the police found cannabis on a property she sublet and barely spent any time.
The defendant’s conviction caused her to lose her job and ruined her reputation. On
appeal, it was held the offence should be classed as a ‘true crime’ requiring mens
rea and so she was acquitted.
Apply: Is the offence in the scenario regulatory in nature? If yes, it is more likely to
be one of strict liability and the defendant may therefore be liable.
Identify: Does the offence relate to an issue of social concern?
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller lydiadavies. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for £5.09. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
