Lecture notes
eye witness testimonies
psych notes on topic of memory EWT aqa exam board
[Show more]
Seller
Follow
Content preview
Factors affecting the accuracy of eyewitness testimony: misleading information.Leading questions
- Questions that point to a certain answer because of how they are phrased.
Loftus and Palmer (car crash) 1974
- Investigated how leading questions influence an eyewitness’s memory for that event.
- 45 American university students in a lab experiment
- shown clips of car accidents and then asked questions about it.
- Participants were split into 5 groups of 9 and given a questionnaire with one leading
question.
- “How fast were the cars going when they ‘….’ Each other”
- Each group was given a different leading verb: smashed, contacted, bumped, collided,
hit.
Findings
- ‘contacted’ resulted in a mean estimated speed of 31.8mph
- ‘smashed’ resulted in a mean estimated speed of 40.5mph
Loftus and Palmer conducted a 2nd study (week later)
- Supported the substitution explanation which proposes that the wording of a leading
question changes the participants memory of the film clip.
- Participants were asked if there “was any broken glass?” in a series of questions.
- Participants in smashed condition said yes.
- Concluded the leading question changed/ reconstructed the expected memory.
Participants who heard the word smashed were more likely to say they had seen broken
glass when there wasn’t any.
How leading questions affect EWT
response-bias explanation wording of a question has no long-term effect on participant
memories but influences how they decide to answer. E.g., when they hear the word ‘smashed’ it
encourages them to choose a higher speed estimate.
substitution explanation the wording of a question does affect eyewitness memory; it
interferes with the original memory and so distorts its accuracy. E.g., in the 2 nd experiment
(Loftus + Palmer) where ppts who heard the word ‘smashed’ reported seeing broken glass (even
though there was none). Showing how the wording of a leading question can change the ppts
memory of the film.
Post event discussion
- Eyewitnesses to a crime may sometimes discuss their experiences and memories with
each other. Leading them to combine other people’s memories with their own,
contaminating or reconstructing their own memory.
Gabbert et al (2003)
- Showed pairs of participants a crime from different perspectives
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller lolamcohn. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for £7.16. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
79271 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now