100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary Unit 3- AC 1.1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the roles of personnel involved in criminal investigations £2.99
Add to cart

Summary

Summary Unit 3- AC 1.1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the roles of personnel involved in criminal investigations

 17 views  0 purchase

Using this got me 98/100 in my Unit 3 exam! Elaborate and detailed notes on Criminology (WJEC) Unit 3 AC 1.1. Includes instructions, colour codes sub topics, and highlights key information from case studies to be used to support points. Layout of pages is ideal for printing to be put in a binder fo...

[Show more]

Preview 1 out of 7  pages

  • September 8, 2024
  • 7
  • 2023/2024
  • Summary
All documents for this subject (372)
avatar-seller
radiyahali
Unit 3 AC1.1- Evaluate the effectiveness of the roles of
personnel involved in criminal investigations
● 45 minutes total
● Choose 4-5 personnel- 10 minutes each
● Discuss how effective these roles can be during an investigation
● Effectiveness should be considered in the context of: cost, expertise and availability


Police Officers
Describe briefly:
● Usually the first personnel called to the crime scene
● Their initial actions are crucial in ensuring everyone's safety
○ They must safeguard the public and attend to anyone with injuries
○ They have to secure the crime scene to conserve any evidence- this means evidence should not
be touched, removed or tampered with
● The period immediately after a crime has been discovered is referred to as the “golden hour”
○ This is when officers must act quickly and carefully to preserve the scene and take any
statements from witnesses while the events are still clear in their minds
○ If police are able to secure the scene quick enough, then there will be little to no contamination
of evidence, which is vital for a successful and accurate investigation
● Officers must also gather enough evidence for the CPS to prosecute, for example: door-to-door
questioning, arresting and interviewing suspects and supporting victims- this helps for a successful
prosecution


Case: Stephen Lawrence -use as limitation
● Details: Stephen was an 18 y/o black man, in 1993 while with his friend Duwayne, he was attacked by 5
white men who were calling him racial slurs. He suffered two 5 inch stab wounds, and died near to
where he was attacked while trying to escape.
● What the police did wrong: did not give him first aid on scene; although Duwayne pointed towards
where the murderers went, no proper search was conducted; house-house searches were not
conducted although it was believed the suspects lived locally; police treated his parents as “gullible
simpletons” and told them very little about the investigation; the police were more interested in
Stephen’s background as they believed he was up to no good, rather than moving forward to find the
killers; delayed making arrests despite tip-offs given, claimed they had no hard evidence, few local
witnesses were questioned and suspect interviews were short and cursory.
● What effect did the Macpherson Report have on police: the report concluded that the investigation into
Stephen Lawrence's murder had been “marred by a combination of professional incompetence,
institutional racism and a failure of leadership”- it named specific officers and criticised the entire police
force. 67/70 of its recommendations successfully resulted in changes in practice/ the law within 2
years of the reports publication. Also created the Independent Police Complaints Commission who had
the power to appoint its own investigators. This helped to improve the police force so officers act in
ways which are compliant to people of different backgrounds, and treat every case the same way.
● However, this case also highlights the institutional racism within the police force and how certain
people are treated differently due to their race. As a result, people may feel unsafe when encountering
police, they may also be doubtful and distrusting of officers. Less crimes will be reported and police
officers will not be called to crime scenes.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller radiyahali. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £2.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

55628 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now

Start selling
£2.99
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added