100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary Unit 3 AC2.3- Understand rules in relation to the use of evidence in criminal cases £2.99   Add to cart

Summary

Summary Unit 3 AC2.3- Understand rules in relation to the use of evidence in criminal cases

 11 views  0 purchase

Using this got me 98/100 in my Unit 3 exam! Elaborate and detailed notes on Criminology (WJEC) Unit 3 AC 2.3. Includes instructions, colour codes sub topics, and highlights key information from case studies to be used to support points. Layout of pages is ideal for printing to be put in a binder fo...

[Show more]

Preview 1 out of 1  pages

  • September 9, 2024
  • 1
  • 2023/2024
  • Summary
All documents for this subject (371)
avatar-seller
radiyahali
Unit 3 AC2.3- Understand rules in relation to the use of
evidence in criminal cases
● 20 minutes (4 marks)
● The rules of evidence: relevance and admissibility, disclosure of evidence, hearsay rule and exceptions,
and legislation and case law
● Use legislation
● Focus on evidence used in court, not the wider investigation/outcome


Relevance and Admissibility
● Relevance refers to the facts that link to the case
● Two types of facts need to be considered:
○ Facts in issue- “principal facts”, matter which are in dispute
○ Relevant facts- facts needed to prove/disprove the Facts in issue
● Evidence is considered admissible if it is credible (reasonable), authentic (trusted) and accurate
(supported)
● For evidence to be allowed to use, its probative value (the value of evidence) must outweigh the
prejudicial effect (the risk of evidence producing an unfair trial)
● Illegally obtained evidence can be: gained by breaking the law or breaching someone’s human rights, or
an illegal search or confessions obtained by torture or degrading treatment
● Another form of illegally obtained evidence is known as entrapment- deception to coerce a suspect into
giving a false confession or inducing them to commit crimes
● Case study- Colin Stagg was suspected to be the rapist and killer of Rachel Nickell, in order to convict
him police needed evidence so undercover officer Lizzie James formed a relationship with him online
where she pretended to share his deviant sexual fantasies. This led to a half confession which was
seen as inadmissible by the judge due to the nature of how it was obtained.
● The Criminal Justice Act 2003 defines bad character as “evidence of or disposition towards
misconduct”- bad character is automatically not allowed to be included as evidence of character
● However, this is admissible when:
○ All parties agree it’s admissible
○ The evidence is given by the defendant themselves
○ It’s relevant to an important matter in the issue


Disclosure of evidence
● The Criminal Procedure and Investigation Act 1996 (later amended by the Criminal Justice Act 2003)
states that full disclosure should be made of all materials held by the prosecution
● The prosecution must notify the accused of the evidence they intend to rely on, and make available to
the defence any unused material they do not intend to rely on
● Hearsay evidence is defined in the Criminal Justice Act 2003 as a “statement not made in oral evidence
in the proceedings that is evidence of any matter stated”, aka evidence which is not firsthand
● Hearsay evidence is not admissible in court, although there are some exceptions:
○ Where all parties agree the evidence is admissible
○ Judge rules it is in the interest of justice
○ Where common law permits
○ Where a witness is abroad, dead, unfit to testify or has disappeared
● Case study: Steven Saunders was sentenced to 18 months for controlling and coercive behaviour
against his partner. The victim did not provide evidence against him but it was rather hearsay evidence
by her midwife which convicted saunders. This was accepted by the judge as it was compelling enough
to convict Saunders for the crime.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller radiyahali. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £2.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

76462 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now

Start selling
£2.99
  • (0)
  Add to cart