Sainsbury, D. (2006). Immigrants’ social rights in comparative
perspective: welfare regimes, forms of immigration and immigration
policy regimes
Goal: offer an alternative perspective to the scholarship that highlights commonalities and
convergence using Esper-Andersons welfare typology.
Research question: how do the welfare state, the form of immigration, and the immigration regime
have patterned immigrants’ social rights across countries?
Immigration policy regime regulated immigrants’ inclusion in or exclusion from society.
Type of migration and entry categories are: labour migrants or economic immigrants, refugees and
asylum seekers or political immigrants, family members, ethnic ‘citizens’, and undocumented
immigrants.
Entry categories create a hierarchical differentiation of immigrants’ social rights.
The liberal (US)
- Welfare state liberal, social rights based on needs, only for the deserving, no universal
right
- Immigration regime inclusive, citizenship based on birthplace (ius soli)
- Entry categories open immigration, economic immigrants, refugees and asylum seekers,
family members and undocumented immigrants
The conservative corporatist (Germany)
- Welfare state conservative, entitlement for social security is labour market participation
(Bismarckian social insurance schemes), work is crucial
- Immigration regime exclusive, citizenship based on ethnicity (jus sanguinis)
- Entry categories after-war immigration: 1) ethnic Germans, 2) guest workers and family
members, 3) asylum seekers and ethnic German. Asylum seekers have little social benefits
The social democratic (Sweden)
- Welfare state social democratic, social rights based on citizenship and universal policy,
equal entrance to welfare system, everybody has the same social rights
- Immigration regime inclusive, citizenship based on residence (jus domicilii), naturalization
is relatively easy
- Entry categories guest workers until 1972, family and refugees, since ‘90s asylum seekers
Conclusion
- The role of welfare states, form of immigration and immigration regime all differ in the three
countries and therefore show divergence rather than convergence. Although there is some
convergence in the countries, a comparison of the key features of the regimes in the early
2000s reveals significant differences.
- Different immigration regimes exhibit diverse responses, reflecting in part the strength of
dissimilar policy legacies and differing policy logics of exclusion and inclusion
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller esmeestek. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for £3.42. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.