100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Previously searched by you
Previously searched by you
logo
Medical Malpractice £3.99
Add to cart
Quickly navigate to
Preview
  2.  
  3. London School Of Economics (LSE)
  4.  
  5. LLB
  6.  
  7. Medical Law

Study guide

Medical Malpractice
 0 purchase

18 pages worth of notes containing lecture notes, summary of academic literature and relevant case law and legislation. Considers a duty of care, breach of duty and what is needed to. satisfy a claim [causation etc]. Considers topic such as remoteness, liability for the birth of a child and wrongfu...

[Show more]

Preview 1 out of 21  pages

Document information

  • December 25, 2019
  • 21
  • 2019/2020
  • Study guide

Subjects

Connected book

book image

Book Title:

Author(s):

  • Edition:
  • ISBN:
  • Edition:

More summaries for

All for this textbook (9)

Written for

All documents for this subject (19)

Seller

avatar-seller
topqualitynotes

Reviews received

Content preview

Medical Malpractice:
Negligence:
- 3 ingredients to successful
o Dr must owe P a duty of care
o Dr must breach that duty
o Breach must cause P’s injury
- Doctor/patient = well established ‘duty situation’- no argument that there isn’t a duty of care.
o A duty of care is imposed upon the doctor once she has assumed responsibility for the patient's care.
 e.g. if a doctor stops at a road site accident - any time they treat anyone.
Hospital may owe primary duty of care to provide adequate service:
- In addition to doctors owing duty- hospital required to run an adequate service- court can find hospital negligent if it fails
to do this. However, courts are reluctant to interfere with policy decisions about the allocation of limited resources.
- Bull v Devon AHA [1993] 4 Med. LR 117 (CA)
o Facts: woman was giving birth to twins in Exeter. Significant delay in calling out a specialist doctor. CA stated
that this was a fairly ordinary scenario [giving birth] so need a situation that is safe for that scenario. Should’ve
been prepared.
o Dillon LJ:
 The Exeter City Hospital provides a maternity service for expectant mothers, and any hospital which
provides such a service ought to be able to cope with the not particularly out of the way case of a
healthy young mother in somewhat premature labour with twins.
- Darnley v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust [2018] UKSC 50
o Duty of the hospital
o UKSC case
o Facts:
 Personal reception had given misleading information about waiting times to someone who had come in.
There was a triage in place- someone with bad injury would be seen earlier. Then the person went
home [didn’t want to wait] and they got sicker. CA held that waiting time = a courtesy, but the UKSC
said it wasn’t- it was ordinary care and there was a duty.
o Lord Lloyd-Jones
 While it is not the function of reception staff to give wider advice or information in general to patients,
it is the duty of the NHS Trust to take care not to provide misinformation to patients and that duty is
not avoided by the misinformation having been provided by reception staff as opposed to medical
staff…
 A receptionist in an A & E department cannot, of course, be expected to give medical advice or
information but he or she can be expected to take reasonable care not to provide misleading advice as
to the availability of medical assistance.
 It is not unreasonable to require that patients in the position of the appellant should be provided on
arrival, whether orally by a receptionist, by leaflet or prominent notice, with accurate information that
they would normally be seen by a triage nurse within 30 minutes.
Could healthcare workers ever owe non-patients a duty of care?
- Wrongful conception
o Carrying out sterilisation operation on a man- but failing. He wouldn’t get pregnant, the partner would. So
compensation wouldn’t be with him, but with her.
o The third party has to be foreseeable.
- Mcfarlane v Tayside Health Board:
o The male patient was married and his wife was in a sufficiently proximate relationship w/ her husband’s
doctors.
- Goodwill v BPAS [1996] 1 WLR 1397
o Facts:
 Woman who got pregnant wasn’t known to the doctor- was a future sexual partner. Not in a special
relationship with her to provide a duty of care. They hadn’t voluntarily assumed responsibility to her-
she wasn’t known to them or to him [later met her]
o Peter Gibson LJ
 The defendants were not in a sufficient or any special relationship with the plaintiff such as gives rise
to a duty of care. I cannot see that it can properly be said of the defendants that they voluntarily
assumed responsibility to the plaintiff when giving advice to Mr MacKinlay.
 At that time they had no knowledge of her, she was not an existing sexual partner of Mr MacKinlay but
was merely, like any other woman in the world, a potential future sexual partner of his, that is to say a
member of an indeterminately large class of females who might have sexual relations with Mr
MacKinlay during his lifetime.
- Psychiatric injury:
o Some important limiting principles
o Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire & White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire
 Have to be within the immediate aftermath and have to experience with unaided senses and has to be
sudden assault. Difficult to fit within the principles

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller topqualitynotes. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £3.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

68175 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 15 years now

Start selling
£3.99
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added