Summary
Summary A-Level OCR Law: Duress by Circumstances
- Module
- A2 Unit G153 - Criminal Law
- Institution
- OCR
A-Level OCR Law: Duress by Circumstances summarised
[Show more]
Seller
Follow
Content preview
DURESS BY CIRCUMSTANCES AND NECESSITYDEFINITION: Duress by circumstances differs from the duress by threats in that the circumstances
dictate the crime rather than a person.
NOT AVAILABLE FOR MURDER, ATTEMPTED MURDER OR TREASON
R v Willer – D and a passenger were driving down a narrow alley when their car was surrounded by
a gang of youths who threatened them. D realised that the only way to get away was to drive on
the pavement. D was acquitted having drove ‘under the that form of compulsion this is under
duress’
THE THREAT
The circumstance must create the threat of death or serious injury – this is an objective test. This
can be directed to the defendant or a family member
R v Conway – A passenger in D’s car had been shot at by two men a few weeks prior, the
passenger saw two men running towards the stationary car and thought the two men were after
him (they were plain clothed policemen). He yelled at the D to drive off fast, D was charged with
reckless driving.
GRAHAM TEST
R v Graham set out that if the defence should succeed, the jury must consider the two-stage test:
1.Was the defendant compelled to act as they did because they reasonably believed that they had
good cause to fear serious injury or death?
2.Would a sober person of reasonable firmness, sharing the characteristics of the accused, have
responded in the same way?
NECESSITY
A circumstance which forces a person act in order to prevent a worse evil occurring.
R v Dudley v Stephens – two shipwrecked sailors ate the cabin boy to survive and had been
charged with murder after being rescued a few days earlier.
RECOGNITION IN CIVIL CASES
The defence has been used more successfully in civil cases but this is a problematic solution to
these situations (Re F)
AS A DEFENCE IN CRIMINAL LAW
The defence may be available for murder though the case was confined to its facts (Re A), no set
precedent.
TEST FOR NECESSITY
1. The act must be done to prevent a greater evil
2. The evil must be directed towards the D or another person they are responsible for
3. The act must be reasonable and proportionate to the evil avoided.
R v Shayler – Shayler was a member of the MI5 and had signed a declaration under the Official
Secrets Act, in breach of this he had provided a journalist with 30 documents which he had
obtained in his position and which related to national intelligence and security issues.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller alevelhelper. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for £4.46. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
82956 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now