100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
ENGR-482 exam 2 Study Guide with Complete Solutions £10.20   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

ENGR-482 exam 2 Study Guide with Complete Solutions

 5 views  0 purchase
  • Module
  • 2024/2025
  • Institution
  • 2024/2025

©GRACEAMELIA 2024/2025 ACADEMIC YEAR. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED FIRST PUBLISH OCTOBER 2024 Page 3/28 Decisions in Columbia Disaster - Ans:--management denied several requests by different engineering groups for clearer photos of foam impact on shuttle wing -although foam strikes were below performa...

[Show more]

Preview 3 out of 28  pages

  • October 23, 2024
  • 28
  • 2024/2025
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
  • 2024/2025
  • 2024/2025
avatar-seller
©GRACEAMELIA 2024/2025 ACADEMIC YEAR. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

FIRST PUBLISH OCTOBER 2024




ENGR-482 exam 2 Study Guide with
Complete Solutions


people involved in challenger disaster - Ans:✔✔-Roger Boisjoly- Enginer at thiokol


Robert Lund- VP engineer at Thiokol


Jerald Mason- Senior VP at Thiokol who pressured to launch


NASA-Marshall


Rogers commission


decisions of Challenger - Ans:✔✔--Boisjoly voiced concerns anout o-ring issues




-Thiokol managers responsible for the go/no-go decision initially offered a no-launch recognition in

response to Boisjoly's objections, but reversed this decision after NASA-marshall administrators reacted

negatively




Page 1/28

, ©GRACEAMELIA 2024/2025 ACADEMIC YEAR. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

FIRST PUBLISH OCTOBER 2024




-Despite being told to "put on his management hat" Roger Boisjoly maintained his view that it was

unsafe to launch Challenger in such cold conditions




-Roger Boisjol testified about the questionable process that led up to the decision to launch Challenger


Technical issues with Challenger - Ans:✔✔--Thiokol engineers in Utah were beginning to realize that O-

ring blowby leakage was adversely affected by temperature, and that low temp launches could introduce

risk that were yet not well understood




-The ambient temp at the Florida launch site on the morning of launch was 36 degrees Farenheit, well

below previous experiences, and with heavy ice buildup on the launch vehicle and tower




-hot gases generated by the combustion of solid rocket fuel in the booster found a pathway through the

joint that is sealed by 2 o-rings and filled with sealing putting


People of Columbia disaster - Ans:✔✔-Rodney Rocha- NASA engineer who had concerns with foam


Linda Ham - NASA senior manager who OK'ed launchColumbia accident investigation BOARD, admiral

HAL Gehman




Page 2/28

, ©GRACEAMELIA 2024/2025 ACADEMIC YEAR. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

FIRST PUBLISH OCTOBER 2024




Decisions in Columbia Disaster - Ans:✔✔--management denied several requests by different engineering

groups for clearer photos of foam impact on shuttle wing


-although foam strikes were below performance specifications of the shuttle, management convinced

themselves that past successes were an indication that a known defect would not cause problems,

instead of deciding the issue on the basis of testing and sound engineering analysis


Organizational factors that contributed to the loss of the Columbia: - Ans:✔✔-1. characterization of the

shuttle as an operational, rather than developmental program


2. schedule pressures


3. organizational barriers preventing effective comm of safety info


4. constrained financial and personnel resources


Technical Issues: - Ans:✔✔-1. impact of a briefcase-sized piece of foam that destroyed the wing leading

edge and the main spar in the left wing


2. defects resulting from a non-optimal design, because the bipod structure and foam application

processes were designed separately


3. hot gases entering a breach in the wing leading edge and destroying the structural integrity of the

wing


Groupthink - Ans:✔✔-situation in which groups come to agreement at the expense of critical thinking

Page 3/28

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller GraceAmelia. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £10.20. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

77254 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now

Start selling
£10.20
  • (0)
  Add to cart