100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary Introduction to Technology Law £10.68
Add to cart

Summary

Summary Introduction to Technology Law

3 reviews
 316 views  24 purchases
  • Module
  • Institution
  • Book

Summary of all relevant information from lectures and the book Technology law by Andrew Murray as well as required case-law to pass the exam well. These notes may look small, but alongside the reader this is, in my opinion, all the knowledge that is necessary for this course. There is no summary fo...

[Show more]
Last document update: 4 year ago

Preview 5 out of 21  pages

  • No
  • Integrates what is relevant from the book into the notes
  • February 10, 2020
  • April 12, 2020
  • 21
  • 2018/2019
  • Summary

3  reviews

review-writer-avatar

By: patriciameka17 • 7 months ago

review-writer-avatar

By: teoto03 • 6 months ago

review-writer-avatar

By: cristicostin1 • 3 year ago

avatar-seller
Week 1 summaries—

Law and technology
OVERALL

Big point:
1.) We have moved from ownership or control over things to ownership or control over
information
‘Shift from atoms to bits’
 Information economy
 Information society
2.) Carrier medium
Bits are economically valuable because they represent new and revolutionary models to
market and deliver products and services, which are by nature informational products and
which were traditionally embedded in carrier medium.

DEFINITIONS
Technology law:
Law relating to the regulation and maintenance of the digitization of everyday and niche areas of
life
Information society:
A society where the main currency has become information instead of physical currency such as
gold
Good v informational goods
1.) Atomsbuilding blocksphysical goodsvalue
2.) Bitsbuilding blocksinformational goodsdisputed value
Rivalrous goods v non rivalrous goods
o Rivalrousconsumption by one consumer prevents simultaneous consumption by
another consumeratomic goods
o Non-rivalrousgood that can be enjoyed simultaneously by an unlimited number
of consumers
Durable goods v non-durable goods
o Durable goodsnot used up by their use and can be shared through
timeinformational goods?
o Non-durable goodsdestroyed by their useatomic goods?
Tangible goods v intangible goods
o Tangible goodsphysicalcan be touchedeconomic value
o Non-tangiblecannot be touchedno economic value
‘Information is valuable, it is also infinitely scalable, non-rivalrous and intangible’
Big data:
o Information collection, aggregation, and exploitation
o Big data is just masses of data and usually has to be non-personalise
Murray: The value is not in the data itself, but what you can do with it

Internet of things:
The internet of things is the extension of the internet connectivity into physical devices and
everyday objects eg smart houses
Digital convergence:
Informational content freed from its carrier medium has converged
Internet v World Wide Web:
The world wide web is not synonymous with the internet. The internet is a massive network
between computers (infrastructure) the World Wide Web (WWW) is a higher-level protocol that
uses the internet as its carrier medium.

,NET NEUTRALITY
Regulation (EU) 2015/2120 on Open Internet Accessdirect applicability in all MSs


Definition: The principle of net neutrality:
The principle that data packets on the internet should be moved impartially, without regard to
their content, destination or source

Four important principles of net neutrality:

1.) No blocking
Of lawful content, applications, services and non-harmful devices
2.) No throttling/limits of speed
3.) No discrimination of content, applications and services

4.) Transparency (and proportionality)
Providers must disclose information regarding their network management practise,
performance, and the commercial terms of service


Net neutrality:
The measures provided for in this Regulation respect the principle of technological neutrality, that
is to say that they neither impose or discriminate in favour of the use of a particular type of
technology
=Second recital
 Because of this technology neutral approach, the biding nature of this regulation is
diminished, it is so vague we do not know what forms of technology it applies to

PROVISIONS
Article 3(1): Technology neutrality
Article 3(3): Provides some net neutrality
Article 3(2): Network providers are still able to agree deals with corporate and individual
customers to provide faster internet access although they cannot impair the wider working of the
internet for the end users
-Two speed internet
Article 3(3): They can also implement reasonable traffic management measures
-difficult to define reasonable
Article 4: Transparency requirement to ensure provisions in 3 are not abused
Article 5(1): National authorities shall closely monitor and ensure compliance with Article 3 and
4, they publish reports on their findings
Article 6: Member states shall lay down penalties for infringement of article 3/4/5. They will
notify the commission of their selected penalties

Main debate with net neutrality: What constitutes reasonable traffic management?

 It is widely accepted that network operators (ISPs) should adopt some traffic management
practises to ensure efficient use of their network
 Growing demand placed on ISPs which require continuous data exchange mean that
traffic management is necessary to ensure that the end-users experience is not disrupted
by congestion

,GENERAL INFORMATION ON TECHNOLOGY LAW

Cartes four reasons for data growth:

1.) Information is easier to generate, manipulate, transmit and store
2.) The cost of collecting, manipulating, storing and transmitting data is lowered
3.) Electronic information has developed an intrinsic value not found in analogue information
due to its very nature
4.) You can make additional digital information through back-up copies

Questions on this week:
 The information society as a whole
 Net neutrality and its principles in the EU regulation

,Week 2 summaries –


Governance in the digital environment
REGULATION OF CYBER-SPACE
 Three theories of governance of cyber-space:

 Cyberlibertarianism

Definition: Cyberspace is a separate sovereign space where real-world laws and real-world
governments have little or no effect

1.) Physical argument:
 Citizencrosses virtual bordernew sovereign statelaws of the old state are not
legitimate or valid
 Virtual digital environment
-No tangible body to imprison
-Digital goods they own are in limitless supply so seizure is impractical

2.) Borderless argument:
 You can move freely around cyberspace without barrier or challenge
 An individual may move seamlessly between zones
 Zones will be governed by different regulatory regimes in accordance with their
personal preference
 Choosing a regulatory regime undermines traditional law-making and enforcement

Proposal for regulation:
 Borderless and intangible nature of the cyberspace means that a regulatory regime
must develop organically with the consent of the majority of citizens of cyberspace
 New internet only laws that reflect the values of the community of internet users
-Regulation from within

Weaknesses of argument:
1.) Physical argument
 Cyberspace is not somewhere we are physically transported to
 Tangible body and physical assets remain in the real world in a jurisdiction which has
laws that you can be subjected to
 Saying there is no tangible body and only digital goods=not true

2.) Community of regulators argument
 No homogenous community of internet users
 People only access information they want to in cyberspace
 The internet isolates individuals
-filters and screens
 No community building (fragmented) and no democratic discourse


 Cyber-paternalism

Definition: Cyberspace is not immune from regulatory intervention by real-world regulators

1.) People are behind the code
 Behind the code and the internet lies people which can be regulated
‘code is never found, it is only ever made and made by us’

, a.) Regulation of ISPs and the relationship between them
b.) Regulation of relationship between ISPs and the individual


Lawrence Lessigs modalities of regulation
 Regulating the cyberspace can be done in the same way as regulating the individual in
the real world
 The key to regulations, whether online of offline, can be found in his four modalities of
regulation
 The individual is a ‘pathetic dot’ who only acts when acted upon
-The four modalities are external forces that act upon the individual and control its
actions
(1) LawConstrains through the legal framework and threat of punishment
(2) Social normsConstrain through societal expectations
(3) The marketConstrains through providing economic alternatives
(4) Architecture Constrains through designing physical spaces in which certain behaviour
is prevented

Proposal for regulation:
 By using carefully selected hybrids of the four modalities, regulators may achieve
whatever regulatory outcome they want

Weaknesses of argument:
 The individual in the middle of cyberspace is not powerless and not alone


Comparison: Cyber-libertarianism v Cyber-paternalism

 Cyber libertarianism:
Cyberspace is unregulatable due to its architecture
Solution: must be regulated from within, internally, because code is another world
 Cyber paternalism:
Cyberspace is regulated by its own architecture
Solution: must be regulated externally, because code is never made, only ever
found and found by us


 Network communitarianism

Definition: The relationship between the digital environment and the real world is a more fluid
affair

Overall: The individual is not powerless and not alone

1.) Not alone:
 The dot is not isolated, but part of a networked community
Share ideas, beliefs, ideals and opinions
2.) An active role for the ‘dot’
 ¾ of the modalities represent community-based control
-Laws Passed by lawmaker elected by the community
-Markets Merely a reflection of demand and supply determined by the community
-Social normscodification of community values

Proposal for regulation:

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller NGardner. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £10.68. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

52510 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now

Start selling
£10.68  24x  sold
  • (3)
Add to cart
Added